Casey Anthony Found Not Guilty. - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2011, 09:36 AM   #1 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash_override View Post
Pro-life people are always looking for an excuse to segue into abortion discussion. It's pathetic really.

Reasonable person: "Hey it's a nice day today".

Pro-life nut: "Yeah, too bad 3500 babies will be aborted by their whore mothers today".
Me: I know, if we tried harder I'm sure we could abort ten times that amount, easy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 08:33 AM   #2 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Thom Yorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,848
Default

It's pretty embarassing to watch people like Nancy Grace going on about this case. Why does it always have to be the loudest, most obnoxious people? No wonder there's such a public outcry over this when they're watching people like her every day.

I remember them interviewing some random lady on the street outside of where the defence was celebrating and she said they were celebrating the death of a little girl. Really?
Thom Yorke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2011, 08:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
A.B.N.
 
djchameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 12,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thom Yorke View Post

I remember them interviewing some random lady on the street outside of where the defence was celebrating and she said they were celebrating the death of a little girl. Really?
Yes because with this verdict they are sending a clear message that they don't care about kids and saying it's okay to murder a kid and you will get away with it.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
IMO I don't know jack-**** though so don't listen to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The problem is that most police officers in America are psychopaths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're a terrible dictionary.
djchameleon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2011, 11:03 AM   #4 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

Everytime a cute white girl is murdered I am the ******* who brings it up, absolutely. I'm sorry if it's insensitive, but I don't care about Caylee or Haylee or Mary-Beth when children are murdered every single day around the world. Not to mention it's difficult for anbody to get a fair trial in a media storm, so it's doubly perturbing to see frenzies around cases like this one.
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2011, 03:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Perturbing frenzies.







My work here is done.
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2011, 07:57 PM   #6 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali View Post
Perturbing frenzies.







My work here is done.
My vocabulary is monolithic.
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2011, 08:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Conan View Post
My vocabulary is monolithic.
You got the mono part right.
So sleazy, you don't even need to kiss asses.
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2011, 07:52 PM   #8 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 981
Default

I was hoping for the death penalty. She really is a piece of trash in human form. She is scum and I wish nothing but the worst for her in the future. The prosecution wasn't good in this case, but it was still ridiculously obvious that she killed her daughter. I think anyone who buys the drowning in a swimming pool story is a moron to be honest.

The defense came up with ridiculous stories and reasons for things that happened but the prosecution missed the boat and couldn't pin any forensics or anything on her. If I was a juror, I'd probably just say fuck it and say she was guilty just because it was pretty obvious.

Of course Facebook blew up over this, and to quote a facebook friend: "Glad to see all of you are crying over a dumb trial. You're all blind to the million other atrocities that happen every single day. If you weren't so ignorant, you'd realize this is just another day in the life of human beings"

Attitudes like this just piss me off... it's like, there's so many murders and crimes committed every day, there is no possible way that anybody could come close to even hearing about half these cases. And I feel like people have this attitude that people who have an opinion on big media cases are idiots or something. Like they aren't valid because they don't care as much about some other random death.
Dirty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2011, 08:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty View Post
I was hoping for the death penalty. She really is a piece of trash in human form. She is scum and I wish nothing but the worst for her in the future. The prosecution wasn't good in this case, but it was still ridiculously obvious that she killed her daughter. I think anyone who buys the drowning in a swimming pool story is a moron to be honest.

The defense came up with ridiculous stories and reasons for things that happened but the prosecution missed the boat and couldn't pin any forensics or anything on her. If I was a juror, I'd probably just say fuck it and say she was guilty just because it was pretty obvious.

Of course Facebook blew up over this, and to quote a facebook friend: "Glad to see all of you are crying over a dumb trial. You're all blind to the million other atrocities that happen every single day. If you weren't so ignorant, you'd realize this is just another day in the life of human beings"

Attitudes like this just piss me off... it's like, there's so many murders and crimes committed every day, there is no possible way that anybody could come close to even hearing about half these cases. And I feel like people have this attitude that people who have an opinion on big media cases are idiots or something. Like they aren't valid because they don't care as much about some other random death.
I have to take issue with several things you just said.

1. Why would you hope for the death penalty? Why would you ever hope to see another human being die? If she was convicted of killing her daughter, which by the way she wasn't, she'd be put in jail for killing another human being. Why would it make sense to kill her? Aren't we punishing her for killing? If she's in jail she's obviously not a threat to other people's lives, so why hypocritically kill her? What's the purpose? Some misplaced sense of revenge and justice? Surely you can see the logical fallacy of pursuing the death penalty on a case like this.

2. "Being pretty obvious" doesn't mean feck to me if there's no forensics. It's my opinion that without solid forensic evidence (and in this particular case there was no forensic evidence) there absolutely shouldn't be a conviction. Why would you risk somebody's entire life on circumstances? You mention "pinning" forensics on her as if you were just desperate for them to convict her. But a trial is about finding truth, not convicting people.

3. I happen to believe that the defense was probably right in the accident theory. There's absolutely no motive whatsoever (she wanted to party? give me a break, that's a stock motive as old as U.S. law itself) and that coupled with the lack of forensics leads me to believe it was definitely the right thing to not convict her. The media was thirsty for a conviction and whittled public opinion down with continual assassinations of character. But being an ***hole doesn't make you a murderer.

I think people seem to forget that you're Innocent Until Proven Guilty, not Guilty Until Proven Guilty. And if a court of law can't prove you guilty, you're innocent. Regardless of my, your, and anyone's personal opinion, you are innocent.

As regards people's attitude of "why care when there's so many atrocities?" I ask you, why do you care? I can understand feeling sympathetic or angry that a child had been murdered, but what is it about a child you've never met, never even heard about while she was alive, that stirs such emotion in people? Why do they care? It seems like people are treating this as a subconscious form of entertainment, or to put it better a mild diversion that they can watch from their homes, feel emotion about and distract them from their own little white kids.
someonecompletelyrandom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2011, 08:29 PM   #10 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 981
Default

I have to take issue with several things you just said.

Quote:
1. Why would you hope for the death penalty? Why would you ever hope to see another human being die? If she was convicted of killing her daughter, which by the way she wasn't, she'd be put in jail for killing another human being. Why would it make sense to kill her? Aren't we punishing her for killing? If she's in jail she's obviously not a threat to other people's lives, so why hypocritically kill her? What's the purpose? Some misplaced sense of revenge and justice? Surely you can see the logical fallacy of pursuing the death penalty on a case like this.
I believe in the death penalty in obvious situations and I was hoping/assuming this case would pretty open and shut. I think she's complete trash and don't want her a part of this earth. Hell, if you can kill your own daughter and go party afterwards, I don't want to trust you to be a safe person around staff or inmates. Basically there is no benefit of having her on this planet, she is scum as a person, and I don't give a shit and wouldn't mind if she dropped dead tomorrow.

Quote:
2. "Being pretty obvious" doesn't mean feck to me if there's no forensics. It's my opinion that without solid forensic evidence (and in this particular case there was no forensic evidence) there absolutely shouldn't be a conviction. Why would you risk somebody's entire life on circumstances? You mention "pinning" forensics on her as if you were just desperate for them to convict her. But a trial is about finding truth, not convicting people.
In that case, I believe this trial failed very hard then. So what do you think Conan? Did she do it or not?


Quote:
3. I happen to believe that the defense was probably right in the accident theory. There's absolutely no motive whatsoever (she wanted to party? give me a break, that's a stock motive as old as U.S. law itself) and that coupled with the lack of forensics leads me to believe it was definitely the right thing to not convict her. The media was thirsty for a conviction and whittled public opinion down with continual assassinations of character. But being an ***hole doesn't make you a murderer.
Well nevermind the question I just asked then. I can't believe anyone would believe that bogus story, especially someone like you who seems like a pretty smart guy. It's such a ridiculous story given the circumstances... She drown in a pool accident so she duct taped her mouth, threw her in the trunk and dumped her body and didn't report it ever happened?? And just coincidentally was also seaching "neck breaking" and for chloroform? Let's put 2 and 2 together here.
Dirty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.