You're not listening to what I'm saying is the problem.

Was the black man un-armed? Was he shot in the back while standing still? Was he choked to death for selling cigarettes on a street corner?

last time i checked, you don't ****ing shoot criminals, you arrest them.

he's going to say the black man deserved to be killed cuz he broke a law.

Last time I checked, you shoot criminals when they put your life or another in trouble.

In this scenario, the criminal is armed and has been warned to drop their weapon. And fully knowing the criminal has a record of killing innocent people.


This is just silly. So you're going to let a killer have the chance to shoot down a cop?

Stop making assumptions and actually read what i'm saying.

i am. there is no way in hell that a homophobic cop for example, if he saw a flamboyant dude or a straight dude.... that he would treat them both the same. just not treating them equally.... yes, that makes him a ****ing ****ty cop.

you're completely ignoring the fact that a lot of times, cops shoot down UNARMED people. why do you keep ignoring that?

Again, you're missing my point. What if the gay man was armed and has been told multiple times to drop their weapon due to their background or criminal record proving they've killed innocent people? Are they not going to shoot them down because they don't want to seem homophobic? That's just silly.