Can God Give Free Will? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2011, 07:52 AM   #81 (permalink)
Supernatural anaesthetist
 
Dotoar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
but people who try to oppose that there is a God or God does not give free will knows that they're on the wrong side of the argument. Too bad for them.
Oh, careful there! It's upon those who claim there is a god to prove it.
__________________
- More is more -
Dotoar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 07:58 AM   #82 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cebu, Philippines
Posts: 677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dotoar View Post
Oh, careful there! It's upon those who claim there is a god to prove it.
it's already proven. the fact that you exist is proof enough.
The Virgin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 08:01 AM   #83 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

it's something which you can neither prove nor disprove
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 08:10 AM   #84 (permalink)
\/ GOD
 
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
Sounds like you got that from Star Wars.
Well and THIS makes more sense:

* God tells Adam and Eve not to eat a fruit
* Adam and Eve eat a fruit
* God punishes ALL humanity, holding a grudge
* God sends down a savior specifically to instruct humanity towards the light
* This savior performs incredible miracles to prove divinity
* This savior pisses people off, so they decide to execute him
* This savior 'lets' himself be executed, as the only way God will ever forgive all of humanity for eating that damn fruit is that if they whip his savior, and nail him to post where he slowly dies, and rots in the fields.

Tell me the logic.
__________________
Quote:
Terence Hill, as recently confirmed during an interview to an Italian TV talk-show, was offered the role but rejected it because he considered it "too violent". Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta declined the role for the same reason. When Al Pacino was considered for the role of John Rambo, he turned it down when his request that Rambo be more of a madman was rejected.
Al Pacino = God
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 08:14 AM   #85 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cebu, Philippines
Posts: 677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra View Post
Well and THIS makes more sense:

* God tells Adam and Eve not to eat a fruit
* Adam and Eve eat a fruit
* God punishes ALL humanity, holding a grudge
* God sends down a savior specifically to instruct humanity towards the light
* This savior performs incredible miracles to prove divinity
* This savior pisses people off, so they decide to execute him
* This savior 'lets' himself be executed, as the only way God will ever forgive all of humanity for eating that damn fruit is that if they whip his savior, and nail him to post where he slowly dies, and rots in the fields.

Tell me the logic.
you're too inclined and focus on the Bible, literally.
That's why I keep telling a lot of people that being religious does not mean being able to fully understand the Bible because that would be ridiculous.
Just know God and accept him and just simply do good, that's enough.
The Virgin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 08:24 AM   #86 (permalink)
\/ GOD
 
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
you're too inclined and focus on the Bible, literally.
That's why I keep telling a lot of people that being religious does not mean being able to fully understand the Bible because that would be ridiculous.
Just know God and accept him and just simply do good, that's enough.
See, and this is the lamest cop-out. Whenever the Bible says something that's horrible, or illogical it's... 'Oh, the Bible didn't mean that literally'.

Bull****, the people who wrote the bible meant 100% of it to be ****ing literal. If you for any moment questioned it in the society where it was written, they'd ****ing cart you to the center of town, and stone you to death.

If not that, they'd be whipping themselves in the back to try to get your attention, and sympathy. Torturing themselves in foreign lands only to prove how seriously, and literally they took it.
__________________
Quote:
Terence Hill, as recently confirmed during an interview to an Italian TV talk-show, was offered the role but rejected it because he considered it "too violent". Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta declined the role for the same reason. When Al Pacino was considered for the role of John Rambo, he turned it down when his request that Rambo be more of a madman was rejected.
Al Pacino = God
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 08:24 AM   #87 (permalink)
myspace.com/stonebirdies
 
Stone Birds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Conor Oberst Was/is Here
Posts: 1,401
Default

let's answer this in a more logical sense:

If god is "All Knowing", then does he/she know everything we will do? Wouldn't he know that will happen, every detail, so wouldn't that mean that in a way everything that will happen was already decided, there is no such thing as "probability" only what will happen, humans are simple creatures that rely on the "probability" of things while god knows what is.
(sorry for the overuse of commas)

so no we don't have free will, we are the most predictable creatures, we are made to believe we have free will even though through the most basic law of the universe "Cause and Effect" basically states it as an impossibility, because every specific cause has a specific effect, and every specific effect also becomes a specific cause so it is an endless cycle of precisely timed events.

but if you want to believe that we do have free will simply make "Cause and Effect" to be a "hoax" from it's biggest flaw see since cause and effect is an endless cycle created from itself it can have no beginning, because it's beginning would have to be an effect of a cause, and that cause would be the effect of another cause, and so on... but if you ask this question you must also ask how the bible makes sense
__________________
//\\//\\/\\/\/\/\\\\\\\\///\/\/\/\/\\////\/\\\\\///\V

//\\//\\/\\/\/\/\\\\\\\\///\/\/\/\/\\////\/\\\\\///\V

[Link removed by mod, no advertising] ... Damn those mods are always gettin ya :)
Stone Birds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 09:16 AM   #88 (permalink)
Supernatural anaesthetist
 
Dotoar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
it's already proven. the fact that you exist is proof enough.
How can you prove that I'm not stemming from the vapor emitted by the invisible flying teapot between Jupiter and Mars? (Or planet Gong, for that matter)
__________________
- More is more -
Dotoar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 02:16 PM   #89 (permalink)
( ̄ー ̄)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,270
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce View Post
it's something which you can neither prove nor disprove
Right, as is the existence of the flying spaghetti monster, invisible magical gnomes, tiny golden teapots orbiting our solar system, or any other infinite number of epistemic absurdities for which there is no evidence nor reason to believe exist. I quite disagree with "you can't disprove it and neither can I!" being a rational, or even accepted, basis for belief.
RVCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 05:12 PM   #90 (permalink)
Supernatural anaesthetist
 
Dotoar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RVCA View Post
Right, as is the existence of the flying spaghetti monster, invisible magical gnomes, tiny golden teapots orbiting our solar system, or any other infinite number of epistemic absurdities for which there is no evidence nor reason to believe exist. I quite disagree with "you can't disprove it and neither can I!" being a rational, or even accepted, basis for belief.
To be fair, as long as it's regarded as the basis for belief and not knowledge, there's not much harm in it. In any case it's basic knowledge that he who makes the positive claim is the one with the burden of proof. However, it also seem to be common practice among believers and so-called 'open-minded' people to disregard that.
__________________
- More is more -
Dotoar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.