|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-24-2011, 07:11 PM | #51 (permalink) | ||
Facilitator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
|
Quote:
I've been thinking about this thread off and on during the day, trying to think of how to show by analogy how wrong and unfair I feel DADT is, even if it was an improvement over the previous outright ban of gay/bi people from the military. The best example I could think of is segregation laws. Sure, they were an improvement over slavery. But segregation...and the fact that people supported it for so long...is a shameful part of human history and nothing to be proud of. Similarly, telling me that if I were to join the military I couldn't acknowledge if the love of my life were a woman, while some officer wears a wedding ring on his finger and openly talks about his wife, his family...is horribly unfair...like a negation of those closest and dearest to me. It is an attack on my "spirit." It's like saying to me, "Yes, you can join the military, but you have to use the back door, and you can't talk." Hmmm...not a pretty picture. I'm glad if it is true that people have over time been ignoring the DADT policy. It is a bad policy that more people *should* have ignored. A government will only have power if people follow its laws. In my opinion it is sad that more people didn't stand up for fairness from the start.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
04-24-2011, 08:34 PM | #52 (permalink) | ||
Alternatively Alternative
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: lost and never found...
Posts: 132
|
i honestly dont think its gonna kill anyone if the few gay military men/women are open. some may not come out anyway just to avoid awkwardness. LGBT community should be able to be open in the military if they wish though, imo.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
04-24-2011, 11:18 PM | #53 (permalink) | |
Partying on the inside
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
|
Quote:
I understand the distaste for violence in any context, but fundamentally, the military is "supposed" to provide a defense against any possible violence against its country. If you don't have a problem with self-defense, then the fundamental idea of a nation's military shouldn't be out of line with that. Obviously, there are a lot of things the military is used for that isn't exactly self-defense... is that what you're talking about? |
|
04-25-2011, 02:52 AM | #57 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,206
|
Quote:
And the fact that there's people who WANT to fight other people. It just doesn't make sense to me. It's very egocentric of me, but I am really thinking; If this is the way to keep safe, let's just kill eachother. Because this is sick. Fighting for peace? Come on. What are we defending ourselves against? Other people, just other people who are just as good or bad as we are. It makes no sense, really.
__________________
Click here to see my collection |
|
04-25-2011, 04:38 AM | #58 (permalink) | ||
Seemingly Silenced
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,312
|
Quote:
"Well hello there friends, I see you've decided to occupy my town, welpt... welcome to the neighborhood. Can I get you some treats?" Give me a f*cking break. The use of violence and peace are far from mutually exclusive.
__________________
My MB music journal Quote:
|
||
04-25-2011, 07:20 PM | #59 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 824
|
Quote:
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
(Vegetius: De Re Militari, 4th century) "If you wish for peace, prepare for war."
__________________
"Lullabies for adults / crossed by the years / carry the flower of disappointment / tattooed in their gloomy melodies."
|
|
|