|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Your view on our president. | |||
I like him personally, and I agree with what he is doing. | 9 | 25.71% | |
I like him personally, but I don't agree with what he is doing. | 15 | 42.86% | |
I don't like him personally, but I agree with what he is doing. | 0 | 0% | |
I don't like him personally, and I don't agree with what he is doing. | 7 | 20.00% | |
I don't know/don't care. | 3 | 8.57% | |
Who's Barrack Obama? | 1 | 2.86% | |
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-04-2011, 05:59 PM | #91 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,711
|
Quote:
|
|
05-04-2011, 07:13 PM | #92 (permalink) | |
Partying on the inside
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
|
Quote:
Didn't Obama want Gitmo closed down? I remember that being part of his campaigning, if I'm not mistaken. What happened? |
|
05-05-2011, 11:51 PM | #93 (permalink) | |||
carpe musicam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº? “I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac. “If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle. "If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon "I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards |
|||
05-05-2011, 11:57 PM | #94 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
|
Quote:
1) Trials against people who have been torturred are... difficult. Information obtained from the people who were tortured is not admissable. This leaves us with people who we know are terrorists, but we can't try because Bush's FUBAR tactics, and we just can't let go... because they're terrorists. 2) Gitmo was such a hellhole people who were sent there on false pretentions (which happened quite a bit, as telling a tribal society, "Point out the terrorist and we'll give you money!" has obvious negative implications) - and who were innocent - have often times turned to terrorism once being freed. Whoopsy daisy! 3) Say you want to release someone. Great. Good luck finding a country who wants to take them in. 4) Those who are guilty, or can't be tried, have few other places they can go. They've begun renovations on a Super-Maximum Security Prison in NW Illinois for this purpose. ... It's really amazing how Bush managed to screw up Conservatism so badly. |
|
05-22-2011, 04:43 AM | #95 (permalink) |
Justifiable Idiocracy
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,244
|
I was just interested in peoples thoughts as to taxing the rich or the wealthy. Giviing reasons as to why you think this would solve Americas economic problems. I myself am not soley on the conservative side of politics nor am I entirely democratic. Both sides have their pros and cons and im not completley sold on either of them. I myself am not rich, but I strongly disagree with this method of thinking. That if we tax the **** out of the rich the less fortunate and overall economic problems will cease. Only 2% out of what we consider to be the top percentile of the wealthy are millionaires. Meaning that the vast majority of whats socially considered rich is on a much lower income base than what the myth consists of. Im assuming rich by most standards is being a million or billionaire? However you only have to be around the 114,000 a year to be considered in the top 10% earner category. Even if its a joint income like if you and your spouse put together earned that much together. Now is over taxing the likes of these people suppose to close the gap on Americas debt and poverty? Or would it in fact in the long run essentially make it worse on americans. I have an open mind and welcome any logical reasoning for a solution. If you could justify how taxing the rich and give definition of what you consider rich. Would solve the deficit and poverty in America. I have no problem with acknowledging fathomable ideas. Just pushing your own concept of what you deem acceptable logic. Out of pure hatred for the prosporous ones in America is hardly either though.
Someone said earlier there may not be a black and white answer for the problem at all and that that maybe part of the problem itself. Which I can definatley find some truth in that statment and agree with it to a certain degree. However I do have some ideas that could possibly lead us in the right direction, and have a diplomatic approach as well. Instead of raising taxes on what we consider rich why not increase the revenue of U.S trades? You could take all the money every rich person in America has and not even come close to closing the gap on the deficit and poverty problem. If we increased the amount of exports in the U.S. undoubtedly the tax revenue would grow. Thus reviving the economy and paving the way for new jobs and spending. I know this isnt an over night answer, and frankly there probaly isnt one of instant gratifacation. Im just looking for a sensible start to try an at least try an fix the problem. Instead of looking to play the blame game out of envy. Why not have a feasonable idea thats can some what please both sides. Or at least bring them to a rationable agreement and maintain some civilness. Maybe another possibility is cutting government spending on things of little substance. We have the highest corporate tax rate in the world, why not.....
__________________
<DoctorSoft>: You know life is good when you take Viagra to jack off lol Amongst Mb's Most Hated (Smiley Face)
Last edited by Bloozcrooz; 05-22-2011 at 07:51 AM. |
|