|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-20-2011, 06:39 AM | #1 (permalink) |
They/Them
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,914
|
Was JFK a good president?
Today is the anniversary of his inauguration, and I got around to thinking about it. Well, do you think he was? Or... do you just think his greatness is just a product of exaggeration because of his assassination? I don't know myself, so it'd be great if a few people could shed a little light on this.
|
01-20-2011, 10:40 AM | #3 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
Honestly, I've been thinking over the exact same thing for awhile. I honestly don't know why people consider JFK such a great president.
Personally, he seemed like he was very coc-ky, and wreckless, and always on the edge of war. He fumbled Cuba horribly, and is praised for bluffing out the Russians once. The trade embargo never dissolved communism, and the Soviet Union stayed strong through his tenure. Worse yet he IS the one who started the Vietnam War. Johnson, and Nixon did fumble it pretty badly afterwards but Kennedy is definitely the one who started it. To his credit, he got a man on the moon, but apart from that, his presidency was so overly exaggerated. I think it was just the fact he was young, good looking(well, by president standards), and extremely charismatic. Plus, he died in his prime in office which brought him to a state of martyrdom. With that said, I think Kennedy was an extremely war-like president, and basically just daring the commies to snap back. Not to mention basically the only reason why he was even in office was because he was part of a mob family(You know, the guys who randomly pick a neighborhood, and snap the knees of everyone there who doesn't give them money, just so they don't get their knees snapped).
__________________
Quote:
|
|
01-20-2011, 06:30 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,206
|
I haven't got a clue, but I do have a vision on things like this.
Everyone who wants to be in charge of a country, isn't suitable to do so. If you're a wise man, you stay well clear of a 'job' like that .
__________________
Click here to see my collection |
01-20-2011, 06:34 PM | #7 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
It's not really a conspiracy theory. Kennedy's father was a bootlegger, and I really don't understand how you could be a bootlegger and not be in/affiliated with the mob.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
01-20-2011, 06:35 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
|
Does being in a mob family guarantee you an election? That's never happened, and more likely than not, never will. I also don't think you're giving him enough credit for what he did for race relations while in office. Beyond any character flaws he may have had, that and his space exploration endeavors make him a good president - in my view.
|
01-20-2011, 07:32 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
Race relations is another one he gets the nod for. However, I don't think he deserves that much credit for the space thing. I mean, all it means is that he chose to fund scientists a lot more than presidents before. I think the scientists deserve a lot more credit than Kennedy.
I think starting Vietnam, however, counteracts all of that. Kennedy was a very aggressive president. I honestly think he would have turned Vietnam very large scale very quickly. Johnson sort of didn't know what the **** he was doing, and Nixon was just plain a crook more concerned about his own paranoid agenda. Kennedy, however, seemed hellbent on taking on the Soviet Union. A war that patience won, not aggression like Kennedy was offering. Also, I'm not saying he bribed his way into office. I'm saying he procured influence, and money, and power from his mob family which eventually assisted him in getting in office.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|