|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,711
|
![]() Quote:
Don't know much about the aerial aspects of WWI, will do some research on it. ![]() I find trench warfare interesting though. Some interesting info on "No Man's Land":No Man's Land ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Holding "tactical air mass" is of course also problematic because planes can only stay up for so long. So generally, these planes and pilots fought eachother. How much that contributed to the war effort on either side is probably negligible compared to what went on closer to the ground, but they also used zeppelins for bombing which is cool.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
![]()
The first world war has cooler imagery, especially with those moonscapes and gasmasks chemical zones, but WWII had more clear cut good guys and bad guys giving it a more dramatic story line.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|