|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 824
|
![]()
I don't find WWI interesting. Too much military inefficiency. Enormous amounts of casualties, only to achieve mediocre tactic and strategic results.
Trivia: French troop transport in the Battle of the Marne. Taxis: ![]() First Battle of the Marne - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
"Lullabies for adults / crossed by the years / carry the flower of disappointment / tattooed in their gloomy melodies."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 347
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
Atchin' Akai
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,769
|
![]() Quote:
The use of submarines was also frowned on and it was the sinking of the Lusitania which had a strong influence on U.S. policy, joining the war against Germany a couple of years later. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM_U-20 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
The Music Guru.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,848
|
![]()
I have to say that I find WWII much more interesting. While it has been done to death in pop culture, I still find it hasn't taken anything out of it for me. I think it's the only Modern Era period that can stack up with the Classics, Egyptian history, and the Middle Ages in terms of interest for me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) | |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
|
![]() Quote:
WWII is on par with all of Egyptian history, Classical Literature, and the Middle Ages - which I assume means globally?
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
Atchin' Akai
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,769
|
![]() Quote:
Each period of time has an effect on future wars, world events etc. Pre WW1 and the Franco-Prussian war (amongst others) had some say in the many allegiances between nations that preceded WW1. The alliances forged prior to the assassination of the Duke was only a matter of lighting the blue touch paper. Years previously the major players had already embarked on an unprecedented arms race for a war that was unavoidable. These European nations had empires and it was only inevitable that these interests would become involved. WW2 as you rightly point out was a product of WW1 and in turn the current situation in the middle east is, arguably, a product of WW2. The point I'm making, is that there is no starting point with history. The past determines the present and the present determines the future. "Why was Germany, which is today considered a Western Nation today, linked with Western Opposition?" Because they didn't have enough allies. Had they had the support they may well have got away with what the allies have done and are getting away with in the middle east today. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|