|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-20-2010, 04:36 PM | #41 (permalink) | |
Seemingly Silenced
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,312
|
__________________
My MB music journal Quote:
|
|
12-20-2010, 04:41 PM | #43 (permalink) | |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Quote:
I like to think I would have had the courage not to take part in it. |
|
12-20-2010, 04:43 PM | #44 (permalink) | |
Seemingly Silenced
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,312
|
You had made a comment a few posts back about the US being late in both World Wars. My comment was in response to that, the rest was just lost in translation (from english to american) I guess.
__________________
My MB music journal Quote:
|
|
12-20-2010, 04:51 PM | #45 (permalink) |
Atchin' Akai
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Unamerica
Posts: 8,723
|
U.S. involvement in both world wars was inevitable, necessary and in your interest. And your government knew it.
From a British point of view, we'd been trying to involve you sooner than later. Had you been involved earlier on both counts, both wars would have ended much sooner and for the betterment of all. This isn't a serious criticism btw. Just a factual and historical observation. No offence intended. |
12-20-2010, 04:51 PM | #46 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 347
|
Quote:
|
|
12-20-2010, 04:57 PM | #50 (permalink) |
...
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,776
|
What I find 'interesting' about WWI (if I can indulge myself in using this term) is the politics of great powers that led to it and the shaping of modern Europe after it. I mean, it started because of the clashing imperialistic interests of great empires which, ironically, led to their crash by the time the war was over.
__________________
|
|