|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-28-2010, 07:34 PM | #61 (permalink) | |||
Supernatural anaesthetist
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
- More is more -
Last edited by Dotoar; 12-28-2010 at 07:44 PM. |
|||
12-29-2010, 12:14 AM | #62 (permalink) | |||
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
12-29-2010, 12:57 AM | #63 (permalink) | ||
Supernatural anaesthetist
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
Quote:
I admit that I have a hard time coming up with an adequate general term for people who'd like to eliminate certain groups of people. Let's stick with striclty a utilitarian then. That's inhumane enough in my eyes.
__________________
- More is more -
|
||
12-29-2010, 03:05 AM | #64 (permalink) | |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Quote:
|
|
12-29-2010, 08:09 AM | #65 (permalink) |
Supernatural anaesthetist
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Posts: 436
|
I can imagine a world without it, a world in which we'd have a much harder time to move around. Do you find trains oppressive too? Airplanes? Boats? Bicycles? People walking around? Or is it the concept of roads you find oppressive in that they - by necessity - take up land area?
__________________
- More is more -
|
12-29-2010, 03:16 PM | #66 (permalink) | |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Quote:
|
|
12-29-2010, 03:26 PM | #70 (permalink) |
Supernatural anaesthetist
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Örebro, Sweden
Posts: 436
|
Apart from hitch-hiking, of course it doesn't. What's your problem? If you can't afford food you'll starve, if you can't afford clothing you'll freeze, if you can't afford a computer you can't make strange remarks on forums about cars hindering our abilities to travel.
__________________
- More is more -
|