|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#71 (permalink) | |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 4,823
|
![]() Quote:
I don't recall. Can you please link me up? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 (permalink) |
Fck Ths Thngs
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
|
![]()
Yes, it really is because by your reasoning we'd have to restructure almost all chemical products and medicine we use and if we made an effort to change those things vaccines would still be middle of the road priority based on risk. Chemistry and medicine are complicated, I doubt it's as easy as "just stop adding those harmful chemicals". Most businessmen don't like adding extra ingredients because it costs more to manufacture.
Edit: Ignoring the one versus many safety argument. The vaccines are still statistically less risky to the individual than the potential to contract/be harmed by the thing they protect you against, right? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 (permalink) | |
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
![]()
I loved this one-sided Mindfullness/DWV rivalry.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|