[MERIT]

Frownland

BBC supports the official story. You consider them a valid source?

An intro to journalism class demolishes about 75% of your points and a lesson on the nature of testimonials causes the other 25% to collapse.

__________________

Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

[MERIT]

Enjoy your slavery

Frownland

Unless you're planning to overthrow the government or something (if you are, then you probably shouldn't get into it for your safety) it's yours too .

Also can't believe that you linked Loose Change tbh. You want to talk about honesty? The directors were paid thousands by Alex Jones to do something that they didn't agree with. Literal shills.

__________________

Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Trollheart

I think all that BBC story can prove is that maybe the identities of the hijackers were false, possibly using stolen passports of other people. Didn't one of them say his passport had been lost? That doesn't prove that they're the hijackers at all, just that some of the people (possibly now mistaken) as the hijackers are still alive, and they would be, as they, well, weren't hijackers. Identity theft as well as aircraft theft? Wow!

__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018

Frownland

Or that more than one person has a particular name. It's like how Michael Bolton would...oh wait you wouldn't get that reference, nevermind.

__________________

Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Trollheart

You just can't stop yourself, can you?

__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018

Frownland

I infer from this post that you actually understand the reference, so what do you think is the significance of the stapler scene?

__________________

Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Chula Vista

Instead of keeping on with your diatribe, please address the following:

1) What became of Flight 77 and those 65 people?

2) Were the hundreds of air traffic controllers and their agencies, who began tracking Flight 77 as soon as it changed course and went radio silent, also in on the conspiracy?

3) Were the numerous random eye witnesses who confirmed it was a plane also in on the conspiracy?

4) A cruise missile would have caused a hell of a lot more damage than a plane. Right? See below:

This Sandia Labs test shows an F-4 Phantom, with water in place of fuel, hitting concrete at 480 mph. American flight 77 hit the Pentagon at about 530 mph (853 km/h).

Steel reinforced concrete building >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aluminum airplane.



5) Did the cruise missile knock over two light poles that were a hundred feet apart perpendicular to the flight path?

__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”

Paul Smeenus

I'm with Chula.

__________________
Gentle Giant Catalog Review

The entire Ditty Bops catalog reviewed