Ancient Astronauts - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-08-2010, 02:20 AM   #1 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zevokes View Post
i would just like to interject with the idea that, yes, it's nice to come onto this forum and speculate on such topics as this with music lovers, but if one is actually going to have an opinion, they should do their research. AND, if it interests one enough to do that research, it should occur to said one that it might actually mean something.

it's been said here already that when imagining the goings-on of a species far more advanced than we are, the line between possible and impossible becomes quite blurred. in my own opinion, the impossible, many times, almost becomes probable.

as soon as a civilization creates its first tool, the inherently exponential growth of information and technology begins. it's also been said that we are a young solar system and that the last hundred years has proved humanity a formidable presence in the realm of information gatherers and technology builders... which is indicative of exponential growth when juxtaposed with the rest of what we know as human history. we just keep going faster. and anybody reading this knows just as well as i do that man alive will not allow that learning curve to stop. we've learned to build things to learn for us.

100 years ago, we didn't have things to learn for us. now, we've been to the moon. we have thousands of satellites orbiting our own planet and others in our solar system. we can take close-up pictures of the f*cking sun. mag-lev trains. the large hadron collider. solar panels. he even have the technology to drill giant holes in the ocean floor and create an oil leak which affect the world for a very long time to come.

so, imagine 100 years from now, being a part of the mass that never halted in its lust for information. hard, but perhaps possible to imagine.



how about 1000 years? your brain would just make stuff up.





100,000 years?

completely and utterly unimaginable.


so, being that our solar system is young, and the universe being so damn pretty big, 100,000 years is nothing. and if it so happens that there are species other than us, there's more than one, and you can probably bet some of them know every corner of the universe.

why?

because we would if we could.

EDIT: another answer to the why, is given that the nature of information's growth is exponential, it's almost impossible for the bearers of information to NOT become all-knowing.
Well, yes - if you accept that there will be no constraints on what science can do, then your assumption should be valid. If you believe there are limits to what can be achieved, for example faster than light travel, then you have a constraint. If you believe creating a wormholes is practically impossible because it requires just about all the energy in the known universe to create one, then you have another constraint. If you take a picture of a quasar, that picture can show a galaxy which is actually billions of years old. You can almost see the start of our universe up there, that's how relatively slow information travels when distances becomes enormous - yet another constraint.

Based on your assumption, it sounds like we should've been visited by a whole bunch of extraterrestrial species already, but where are they? If we visited a different planet that had primitive intelligent life on it and a wealth of other organisms and resources, do you think we would've just left? I don't think so, I think we would've tried to use those resources for ourselves or, from a more positive perspective, at least nurture those resources. If these aliens visited planet earth, they left no proof behind that we've found like f.ex alien technology. They are not trying to stop us destroying our oasis in space either.

If you say we must have been visited by aliens, you should also come up with some answers to such questions.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 03:25 PM   #2 (permalink)
DO LIKE YOU.
 
P A N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tore View Post
Well, yes - if you accept that there will be no constraints on what science can do, then your assumption should be valid. If you believe there are limits to what can be achieved, for example faster than light travel, then you have a constraint. If you believe creating a wormholes is practically impossible because it requires just about all the energy in the known universe to create one, then you have another constraint. If you take a picture of a quasar, that picture can show a galaxy which is actually billions of years old. You can almost see the start of our universe up there, that's how relatively slow information travels when distances becomes enormous - yet another constraint.

Based on your assumption, it sounds like we should've been visited by a whole bunch of extraterrestrial species already, but where are they? If we visited a different planet that had primitive intelligent life on it and a wealth of other organisms and resources, do you think we would've just left? I don't think so, I think we would've tried to use those resources for ourselves or, from a more positive perspective, at least nurture those resources. If these aliens visited planet earth, they left no proof behind that we've found like f.ex alien technology. They are not trying to stop us destroying our oasis in space either.

If you say we must have been visited by aliens, you should also come up with some answers to such questions.
firstly, i'd like to say that although i am indeed no scientist at all, i think it's highly likely that the physical world we seek to describe with the verse of science is much less visible that what the tools of the future will permit us to see. so for the most part, yes, i believe there are nearly zero constraints.

that being said, and to counter your statement concerning the will of aliens to stay or go, i should think they have the tools i speak of, and look at us and see that we are not yet ready to hold them. perhaps a moral binding is held dear and the interruption of Earth is simply non-permissible.

regarding wormholes, i do not really believe anything about them. i believe all the possibilities though, in that i have never had my own wormhole to observe. and besides, if wormholes do in fact exist, and they do in fact require just about all the energy in the known universe to be created, wouldn't i just [I]not[I] be here to speculate?

regarding the speed at which information travels through space and time: you are quite right in saying that we can see the light from many millions of years ago. i must admit that i don't see the relevancy of it. if you are referring to my words about "the exponential growth rate" of information, that's something entirely different, referring only to what can be easily observed here on planet earth, which is the quantity of data we have access to, essentially.

and lastly, regarding physical artifacts left by extra-terrestrials: you should really do some research. i'm not gonna sit here and be the guy who preaches about the things he's seen. but i will say that if you look real hard, you will find something really eye-opening. you might even, if you look hard enough, find official evidence in the form of government documents.
P A N is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.