Ariz. governor signs immigration enforcement bill - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2010, 10:56 PM   #51 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo View Post
Noooooooo.

We must save the burritos. Goddammit America.
I was pissed when I saw this. America doesn't hate Mexican's, we hate Arizonians.

(who incidentally may be Mexican's)

Edit: To be honest, this law is going to rat-**** the Republican party in 2010 elections. 4 states currently have a majority-minority population; California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. The Lation vote has been sleepy, disinterested, flying below the radar. But this Law basically says "hey we're going to harass the holy **** out of you at best."

The only state capable of surviving is Texas, who has a savvy governor and a policy-not-party system working down there. The other three states, which stood to be big Republican wins are going to get crushed, and I think for at least the next 10 years, Republicans will have to outright court the Latino vote, even if this means excising some of the hard-liners.
__________________
I've moved to a new address

Last edited by TheBig3; 04-29-2010 at 08:19 AM.
TheBig3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 08:25 AM   #52 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAlejo View Post


I loved this picture too. Apparently it's a crime to do something illegal these days.

(and yes, when looking specifically at the law, the caption is technically correct, it's still laughable)
Well let me be the cunning linguist here. I think, if we're giving them the benefit of the doubt, they meant to say its a crime now on the state level. Such things were, as best I can recall, just an outright violation of a states soverignty.
__________________
I've moved to a new address
TheBig3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 10:17 AM   #53 (permalink)
Muck Fusic
 
IamAlejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,575
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog View Post
Well let me be the cunning linguist here. I think, if we're giving them the benefit of the doubt, they meant to say its a crime now on the state level. Such things were, as best I can recall, just an outright violation of a states soverignty.
Right, which is why I had the statement in parenthesis. It's a federal crime, now it's also a state law. But the caption was too good to not post. It's imprecise, though technically not incorrect.
__________________
a man, a plan, a canal, panama
IamAlejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 10:18 AM   #54 (permalink)
Muck Fusic
 
IamAlejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,575
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thebig3killedmyraindog View Post
i was pissed when i saw this. America doesn't hate mexican's, we hate arizonians.

(who incidentally may be mexican's)

edit: to be honest, this law is going to rat-**** the republican party in 2010 elections. 4 states currently have a majority-minority population; california, arizona, new mexico, and texas. The lation vote has been sleepy, disinterested, flying below the radar. But this law basically says "hey we're going to harass the holy **** out of you at best."

the only state capable of surviving is texas, who has a savvy governor and a policy-not-party system working down there. The other three states, which stood to be big republican wins are going to get crushed, and i think for at least the next 10 years, republicans will have to outright court the latino vote, even if this means excising some of the hard-liners.
o rly? Also, in Arizona the law is said to be in favor by it's citizens 3 to 1.


Quote:
Fifty three percent of likely Arizona voters are concerned that the state's tough new law targeting illegal immigrants will also be used to violate the civil rights of United States citizens.

The majority of them support it anyway.
(From http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blo...eRoberts/79298)

Not saying you're wrong, but it's not that simple. This bill is really just a result of public outcry. I'm not saying that's how bills should/can be made, but to say that it will crush their vote because of it isn't all that true. Besides, the Hispanic vote has never been heavy Republican.
__________________
a man, a plan, a canal, panama

Last edited by IamAlejo; 04-29-2010 at 10:24 AM.
IamAlejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 11:10 AM   #55 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAlejo View Post
o rly? Also, in Arizona the law is said to be in favor by it's citizens 3 to 1.




(From azcentral.com blogs - Laurie Roberts' Columns & Blog - LaurieRoberts - Arizona immigration law: Are you listening, Mr. President?)

Not saying you're wrong, but it's not that simple. This bill is really just a result of public outcry. I'm not saying that's how bills should/can be made, but to say that it will crush their vote because of it isn't all that true. Besides, the Hispanic vote has never been heavy Republican.
Thats based on polling. You're dealing with a demographic that does its best to fly under the radar, especially since the law enforcement there can jail them for looking too Mexican.

As far as Lation votes not being "republican" I'm not sure about that. Heres the stats I'd look at.

1. As terrible as it is to lump two groups only combined by language, the spanish-speaking vote has generally gone republican because of the hard-line anti-Castro stance they take.

2. Arizona's largest political figure has been someone who's been, until recently, for giving the Latino a fair shake.

3. In 2004, Latino's we're a heavily courted constituency by then-President Bush.

4. The religios factor has always been republian, which is a general characteristic (be it a generalization or not) of the Latino population.

The Latino's who vote may not have been republican in any one poll or election, but you're going see the beehive riled up, if you catch my drift. They'll vote this time. We're only 5 months away from elections and I doubt this will be done with tomorrow.
__________________
I've moved to a new address
TheBig3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 12:36 PM   #56 (permalink)
Muck Fusic
 
IamAlejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,575
Default

The Latino vote has really never been close if I remember correctly. I'll search the numbers later.

As I've stated, me being from VA you from MA, we really have no idea how bad it is down there. From everything I've read, this is a direct result of the public outcry for help.

And as much of a draw it is for Latinos to rile up and vote, it's the same for the "Learn English of get out" crowd down there.
__________________
a man, a plan, a canal, panama
IamAlejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 01:11 PM   #57 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAlejo View Post
And as much of a draw it is for Latinos to rile up and vote, it's the same for the "Learn English of get out" crowd down there.
Except they're out numbered.
__________________
I've moved to a new address
TheBig3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 02:54 PM   #58 (permalink)
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
 
duga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAlejo View Post
o rly? Also, in Arizona the law is said to be in favor by it's citizens 3 to 1.
This is kind of a funny statistic considering the Hispanic population in Arizona (legally, anyway) is roughly 1/3 of the population.

Not that this means anything, just interesting...

Carry on...
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph...
duga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 05:26 PM   #59 (permalink)
Muck Fusic
 
IamAlejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,575
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duga View Post
This is kind of a funny statistic considering the Hispanic population in Arizona (legally, anyway) is roughly 1/3 of the population.

Not that this means anything, just interesting...

Carry on...
You have no idea of how bad it is if you believe that all Hispanics are against this bill.
__________________
a man, a plan, a canal, panama
IamAlejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2010, 05:28 PM   #60 (permalink)
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
 
duga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAlejo View Post
You have no idea of how bad it is if you believe that all Hispanics are against this bill.
Didn't say they were. I'm just saying...you could definitely distort that statistic if you tried.

But I'm still against this thing.
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph...
duga is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
  • Zodiac signs, Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion Forum, 89 replies
  • Immigration, Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion Forum, 95 replies
  • Signs Of Hope, Hardcore & Emo Forum, 2 replies



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.