Internet censorship - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2009, 09:51 PM   #31 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
Sam said "they did the same thing in 1980s America," I don't know, I am trying to think if they had Internet censorship in the 80's, In all honesty I don't know if they did the same thing happened in America in the 80's. I remember watching a VH1 or maybe it was a History Channel documentary about either the computer or the internet and they said when they first had internet at colleges and/or universities, computer geeks used to send porn to each other but the only problem was their computer was like only 2K bite of memory so the picture was made up of text characters like "X's" and "O's" And I was wondering like if the professors at the colleges and/or universities got hold of what they were doing then they might of tried to put a stop to it - aka censorship. It was a documentary I vaguely remember and I forgot what decade, it could had been the 80's.
Did it occur to you that maybe he was referring to some other instance of censorship, not necessarily involving the internet?
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 09:55 PM   #32 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam View Post
one cannot be an effective troll and consider relevancy when making idiotic posts.
It just seems so natural it's like he isn't even doing it on purpose... I just have a hard time accepting that people can actually be that stupid unintentionally.
Meh... I guess it comes with the territory though.
Anyway, forgive me for having to speak up about it.
I should know better than that by now with that guy.
__________________
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 09:57 PM   #33 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan View Post
Sam said "they did the same thing in 1980s America," I don't know, I am trying to think if they had Internet censorship in the 80's, In all honesty I don't know if they did the same thing happened in America in the 80's. I remember watching a VH1 or maybe it was a History Channel documentary about either the computer or the internet and they said when they first had internet at colleges and/or universities, computer geeks used to send porn to each other but the only problem was their computer was like only 2K bite of memory so the picture was made up of text characters like "X's" and "O's" And I was wondering like if the professors at the colleges and/or universities got hold of what they were doing then they might of tried to put a stop to it - aka censorship. It was a documentary I vaguely remember and I forgot what decade, it could had been the 80's.

I know of a couple of similar stories of censorship. Like I was watching how they made the album by The Doors and the story goes like the producer on the Ed Sullivan show didn't want Jim Morrison to say "Baby we can't much higher" He wanted Jim to sing "Baby we can't get much better you dig." But Jim Morrison sang it anyway, much ot the chagrin of the Ed Sullivan Show producer. And then after the show the producer yelled at The Doors saying they would never ever do the Ed Sullivan show again and then Jim Morrison retorted "Hey Man, I just did the Ed Sullivan Show."

Dude... go back and read the post he wrote.
Sit a long long time and realize exactly what it says and what it refers to. You're barking up a tree that doesn't even exist, in this scenario.


Edit:
Sorry, let me change that to: You're barking up the wrong tree...
Because god knows you'd fuck up that interpretation as well.
__________________
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 10:13 PM   #34 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali View Post
Dude... go back and read the post he wrote.
Sit a long long time and realize exactly what it says and what it refers to. You're barking up a tree that doesn't even exist, in this scenario.


Edit:
Sorry, let me change that to: You're barking up the wrong tree...
Because god knows you'd fuck up that interpretation as well.
What do you mean by "tree"? In the 80s they didn't even have trees like we have today.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 10:19 PM   #35 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
What do you mean by "tree"? In the 80s they didn't even have trees like we have today.


And... and technically, to bark up the wrong tree would simply mean to be barking up a tree that exists in our current time, so since the situation started in the 80's, the tree would not have been in the same format, and since the arithmetic of nature dictates that trees do not grow forward in time but that time grows around the vertical nature of trees, then you are obviously wrong.

Thanks,
Neapolitan.
P.S... I used a spell checker.

Edit:
And a grammar coach.
__________________
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 10:24 PM   #36 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali View Post
Dude... go back and read the post he wrote. Sit a long long time and realize exactly what it says and what it refers to. You're barking up a tree that doesn't even exist, in this scenario. Edit: Sorry, let me change that to: You're barking up the wrong tree... Because god knows you'd **** up that interpretation as well.
Now when you say "barking" do mean "bark" like a dog or "bark" like what's on a tree?

And I did read his post a couple of times.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 10:33 PM   #37 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

So you're this ridiculous on purpose?
__________________
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 10:38 PM   #38 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali View Post
So you're this ridiculous on purpose?
Didn't you ever wonder if "barking" was A.) a dog barking up a tree or B.) someone putting the wrong bark on tree? Like putting the bark of a Maple tree on a Birch tree? Like maybe someone in props dept. in Hollywood. Don't tell me you don't think about those things??
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 10:39 PM   #39 (permalink)
FakingSuicideForApplause
 
Dr.Seussicide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: I live in a van down by the river
Posts: 1,365
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freebase Dali View Post
So you're this ridiculous on purpose?
I honestly don't even know anymore... I'm hella confused right now

I need to stop reading his posts...
__________________
I'll stay if I ever could, and pick up your pieces babe, because there's never a perfect day.

Dr.Seussicide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 01:26 AM   #40 (permalink)
we are stardust
 
Astronomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zarko View Post
Australia>>>>>>>>Boring New Zealand. Nice to visit NZ, not much else.

The funny thing in relation to R games, is that half the time, games that are 18+ in America are down to 15+ in Australia with minimal changes. So its actually allowing a greater proportion of kids to view inappropriate material at a younger age.
This is true, but what usually happens is that the games get toned down so that they can fit the 15+ rating.

Left 4 Dead is an example of this. In the US it was released as 18+, however when it came to Australia a lot of the gore was cut out so that it could be sold as 15+. Left 4 Dead 2 didn't even make it into the 15+ rating so you can't purchase it at all in Australia.

If R18+ ratings for games was introduced to Australia, 1) Violent games would not be streamed into the 15+ category so younger gamers wouldn't be viewing unappropriated material and 2) More games would be available in Australia and they wouldn't have to be modified or toned down.
__________________
Astronomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.