Should Australia become a republic? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2010, 04:17 PM   #31 (permalink)
we are stardust
 
Astronomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie Jane Devo View Post
Would you mind explaining what "works well" about your government? I've heard some bad things about Australia regarding telecommunications privacy, censorship laws and the public transport system, so I have a feeling there's quite a lot of room for improvement.
I didn't necessarily mean that our actual laws were good, but I meant the way our constitution operates and how the government is elected works well. I think our constitution is fair and allows for freedom of the people and of opinions. I'm definitely not saying that other countries who are republics don't have this fairness and freedom, I'm just saying that since we have it, why change it?

What more specific bad things have you heard about Australia? Because I can't really relate to any of what you have said as being bad for me personally. Some bad decisions have been made in our laws, in which people have complained about, so the government has then tried to rectify their decision. I think this shows that the way our constitution works is fair. Like I said, I wasn't talking about specific laws but more so the way our government operates.

The fact that several of our cities (and NZ's cities to be fair) beat any places from the US or the UK into the list of the world's most livable cities (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World's...livable_cities) shows that we have a good system in place as these surveys take into account: safety, hygiene, public transport, education, recreation, availability of goods and services, low personal risk, effective infrastructure, crime, tolerance, pro-active policy developments, and healthcare. I really don't think there is anything bad about our society and government and how they operate and this should act as a reference to show this. I consider myself very lucky and really don't want to change something that is already great.

I've heard much worse things about the rest of the world, where things like the healthcare system and education system (which are much more important IMO than public transport and telecommunications) get a lot of criticism and I know I would certainly prefer Australia's system.

There is nothing wrong with how our constitution operates, so why change it. We are a happy, free, and fair country, so why try to fix anything that's not 'broken'? That's all I'm saying.
__________________

Last edited by Astronomer; 01-04-2010 at 04:45 PM.
Astronomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 05:35 PM   #32 (permalink)
i write and play stuff
 
OceanAndSilence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 239
Default

yes
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/chrisneto - tune in to chill out
OceanAndSilence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 06:41 PM   #33 (permalink)
moon shoes
 
Ronnie Jane Devo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lateralus View Post
I didn't necessarily mean that our actual laws were good, but I meant the way our constitution operates and how the government is elected works well. I think our constitution is fair and allows for freedom of the people and of opinions. I'm definitely not saying that other countries who are republics don't have this fairness and freedom, I'm just saying that since we have it, why change it?

What more specific bad things have you heard about Australia? Because I can't really relate to any of what you have said as being bad for me personally. Some bad decisions have been made in our laws, in which people have complained about, so the government has then tried to rectify their decision. I think this shows that the way our constitution works is fair. Like I said, I wasn't talking about specific laws but more so the way our government operates.

The fact that several of our cities (and NZ's cities to be fair) beat any places from the US or the UK into the list of the world's most livable cities (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World's...livable_cities) shows that we have a good system in place as these surveys take into account: safety, hygiene, public transport, education, recreation, availability of goods and services, low personal risk, effective infrastructure, crime, tolerance, pro-active policy developments, and healthcare. I really don't think there is anything bad about our society and government and how they operate and this should act as a reference to show this. I consider myself very lucky and really don't want to change something that is already great.

I've heard much worse things about the rest of the world, where things like the healthcare system and education system (which are much more important IMO than public transport and telecommunications) get a lot of criticism and I know I would certainly prefer Australia's system.

There is nothing wrong with how our constitution operates, so why change it. We are a happy, free, and fair country, so why try to fix anything that's not 'broken'? That's all I'm saying.
Yeah, Australia really does seem like a great place overall, and the U.S. probably is a political shithole in comparison, I just wanted to challenge you a bit on your "works well" claim since there didn't seem to be a lot of justification behind it at first. Now to explain my statements:

The censorship thing I'd heard about from someone else, and only now just read up on it here. It's really pretty minor as it currently stands, but still the government has no business banning works of art.

The public transport issue I heard about from a guy on another forum who lives in Melbourne and described the situation there as "fucking terrible" and "getting worse every year due to population increase in the inner city and poorly managed privatisation". Here's what he said about it:

Quote:
Yeah it's barely usable. The State government have just sacked the main train operating company in Melbourne because they've been abysmal. Constant delays, maintenance fuckups, terrible management of said delays & fuckups, etc. Who knows what the new company will be like. And the government have also just attempted to bring in a new high-tech ticket machine system which not only doesn't work properly, but is only available on trains when it was supposed to be buses and trams as well, and the tickets can only be ordered online because they haven't organised getting them into shops yet. If I was trying to use PT to get to work I probably would have gone postal by now.
The telecom privacy thing was also hearsay, and I haven't actually found any texts online to back it up, so I guess never mind that.

So yeah, certainly some room for improvement, but hardly a big deal compared to problems in the rest of the world.
__________________
Last.fm
Ronnie Jane Devo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 06:49 PM   #34 (permalink)
we are stardust
 
Astronomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie Jane Devo View Post
Yeah, Australia really does seem like a great place overall, and the U.S. probably is a political shithole in comparison, I just wanted to challenge you a bit on your "works well" claim since there didn't seem to be a lot of justification behind it at first. Now to explain my statements:

The censorship thing I'd heard about from someone else, and only now just read up on it here. It's really pretty minor as it currently stands, but still the government has no business banning works of art.

The public transport issue I heard about from a guy on another forum who lives in Melbourne and described the situation there as "fucking terrible" and "getting worse every year due to population increase in the inner city and poorly managed privatisation". Here's what he said about it:



The telecom privacy thing was also hearsay, and I haven't actually found any texts online to back it up, so I guess never mind that.

Yeah, that's fair enough. I agree the Internet Censorship thing is bullshit, but a lot of people have been up in arms about so they are looking to review it, which is promising. And public transport is also a joke, but I can understand how difficult it would be organising transport in a country which is so widely spread apart in terms of population.

So yeah, you're absolutely right in that there a variety of issues that need to be addressed and that aren't running particularly smoothly. But no doubt you get small issues like these in every community! Generally, in terms of major things like health, education, and employment, I think we're doing pretty alright and I think the government operates in a really fair and free way.

Which is why I think it'd be silly to review how we operate as a country when there is nothing major that is wrong. Like Vanilla said earlier, there are way more positives to being associated with the British Commonwealth than negatives, so why change that?

Edit: I'm also not saying that other countries like the US don't have this freedom and fairness, because no doubt they do! Australia is by no means 'better' than anywhere else. I'm just saying that since we have achieved it in our constitution, there doesn't seem any need to review it/change it, if you get what I mean.
__________________
Astronomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 01:57 PM   #35 (permalink)
moon shoes
 
Ronnie Jane Devo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 57
Default

Looks like things in Australia aren't quite as rosy as I first thought:

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSSGE61805120100209
http://www.smh.com.au/business/dont-...0219-8c6e.html

It appears there's close to $2 trillion in private debt in Australia, twice its GDP. You guys may be on your way to the same credit crunch followed by massive layoffs and housing foreclosures that the US has been experiencing, while your government conveniently ignores the problem.
__________________
Last.fm
Ronnie Jane Devo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 12:49 PM   #36 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 112
Default

The situation in Australia is probably a good testament to the situation all over the world.

Nevertheless music will continue unscathed so we're still happy
bubu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 11:00 AM   #37 (permalink)
moon shoes
 
Ronnie Jane Devo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 57
Default

Well yeah, pretty much every Western government in the world right now seems to be allowing its banks to pillage and defraud its citizens while either saying nothing about it or offering misleading 'solutions' to the problem. And because international institutions like the UN and EU are gradually becoming more and more powerful, I assume that trend is only going to continue.
__________________
Last.fm
Ronnie Jane Devo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 01:31 PM   #38 (permalink)
My home? Discabled,
 
Barnard17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 204
Default

The UN and EU aren't removing a nations sovereign ability to curtail wanton banks. And on the same coin if the representatives in the EU decided to use the powers their electorate voted them to have they could also do something about the situation. Don't use the situation to negatively sensationalise globalisation.

I'm afraid the problem is that the Western world states are subversive oligarchies in which the sovereign government lies cuckold to the interests of Big Money.
__________________


Vita brevis,
Occasio praeceps
Barnard17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 08:32 PM   #39 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie Jane Devo View Post
Well yeah, pretty much every Western government in the world right now seems to be allowing its banks to pillage and defraud its citizens while either saying nothing about it or offering misleading 'solutions' to the problem. And because international institutions like the UN and EU are gradually becoming more and more powerful, I assume that trend is only going to continue.
Wendy?
__________________
I've moved to a new address
TheBig3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 08:46 PM   #40 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnard17 View Post
The UN and EU aren't removing a nations sovereign ability to curtail wanton banks. And on the same coin if the representatives in the EU decided to use the powers their electorate voted them to have they could also do something about the situation. Don't use the situation to negatively sensationalise globalisation.

I'm afraid the problem is that the Western world states are subversive oligarchies in which the sovereign government lies cuckold to the interests of Big Money.
That's easily how I would describe the PRC, not so much the rest of the world.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.