|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Was there a Lunar Landing? | |||
yes | 37 | 80.43% | |
no | 6 | 13.04% | |
insufficient evidence | 7 | 15.22% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-28-2009, 12:03 AM | #83 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hot-lanta
Posts: 3,140
|
So you're willing to admit that historically documented events DID happen until you make a thread on said events at which point you're unwilling to commit either way? Am I understanding you correctly?
|
07-28-2009, 12:54 AM | #89 (permalink) |
carpe musicam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
|
To whom are you refering to as "that guy?" that is so unnecessary to call anyone a douchebag. I don't consider Bugalow a douchebag or anyone else who posted on this page.
I can not understand why he insist I take a side when I want to hear both side about the Moon Landing. It's not so wrong to take a step back and listen to what others have to say. I think I am pretty much open minded and interested in what people have to say. I considered Bungolow pretty much more aggressive and belligerent in his posting by criticizing my English etc. ( and calling troll - whatever that means) I don't play like that, I don't revert to naming calling to prove my position. Last edited by Neapolitan; 07-28-2009 at 01:10 AM. |
07-28-2009, 01:13 AM | #90 (permalink) | |
Partying on the inside
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
|
Quote:
Bugalow was calling him a troll, because unless that guy is really ignorant or mentally challenged, then he's likely trolling. You have any idea of who we're talking about here?
__________________
|
|
|