Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   Moon Landing? (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/42666-moon-landing.html)

Neapolitan 07-21-2009 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swim (Post 707644)
We definitely landed on the moon at some point they put a big reflector up there that you can shoot a high power lazer at.


I'm not sure but I think it is spelled "laser." I think a "lazer" is someone from the slacker generation, but I'm not sure. Did you ever see one of those t-shirt that says like "slacker" or "lazer?" I heard the engineer or scientist who built that was called Alan Parson. I think I remember reading something about the Alan Parson's Project, in Scientific American, or some other magazine. But how does that prove we land on the moon, could they drop the big reflector from a lem.

Fruitonica 07-22-2009 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo (Post 707526)
I don't know how we could possibly polute mars, it's not exactly in the best condition as it is.

First we terraform it, then we fuck shit up.

cavanherk 07-22-2009 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wayfarer (Post 707501)
I don't know and neither do you.


I can't see the flag or the footprints from here.

RHCP:

"Space may be the final frontier
But it's made in a Hollywood basement"

Can't say I believe or not, I don't see why not but I find it rediculous that NASA recorded over the original tapes because "there was a tape shortage."

swim 07-22-2009 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan (Post 707761)
I'm not sure but I think it is spelled "laser." I think a "lazer" is someone from the slacker generation, but I'm not sure. Did you ever see one of those t-shirt that says like "slacker" or "lazer?" I heard the engineer or scientist who built that was called Alan Parson. I think I remember reading something about the Alan Parson's Project, in Scientific American, or some other magazine. But how does that prove we land on the moon, could they drop the big reflector from a lem.

It's not my fault English doesn't make sense. It makes a z sound so I put a z.

Neapolitan 07-22-2009 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swim (Post 707644)
We definitely landed on the moon at some point they put a big reflector up there that you can shoot a high power lazer at.

Quote:

Originally Posted by swim (Post 707827)
It's not my fault English doesn't make sense. It makes a z sound so I put a z.

I'm not worried about how "laser" soundz or how it's spellt. I was more interested if weather or not you believe if it was possible that those big reflector(s) could had been dropped from a lem? I think I heard something about it but I'm not sure that there were a bunch of tetrahedra. I think they used a tetrahedron shape because there is no wrong side up.

I think it is not conclusive proof there those big reflector(s) place on the moon by human astronaut hands, they could had been tossed from a window of the lem while it was flying over the moon, do you know what I mean?

lucifer_sam 07-22-2009 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swim (Post 707827)
It's not my fault English doesn't make sense. It makes a z sound so I put a z.

it's an acronym for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation.

hence it's not one of those things where there are multiple accepted spellings.

Janszoon 07-22-2009 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucifer_sam (Post 707855)
it's an acronym for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation.

hence it's not one of those things where there are multiple accepted spellings.

Except in places where they spell it "ztimulated".

Sodacake 07-22-2009 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweet_nothing (Post 707198)
Well it is pretty strange that we landed on the moon 40 years ago when we can barley do it today. And modern tech today is so advanced in comparison to that time I mean look a the iphone, and in the 60's they barley had computers. But it doesn't really matter as long as we get the credit and beat those commies, we're still #1 baby.

It's not that you "can barely do it today", it's that NASA has collected enough samples on the moon to study and it started costing too much sending astronauts to the moon every few years.

Janszoon 07-22-2009 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sodacake (Post 707875)
It's not that you "can barely do it today", it's that NASA has collected enough samples on the moon to study and it started costing too much sending astronauts to the moon every few years.

Exactly.

Stone Birds 07-22-2009 11:51 AM

i don't care so i chose all three


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.