|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#28 (permalink) | |
Aural melody discerner
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: in a truck down by the interstate
Posts: 347
|
![]() Quote:
Here's the math: 500 people work for a factory all year with no turnover (hypothetical), make $7 per/hr. work 40 hrs. per/wk. That's a pre-tax bringhome of about $15k per yr. If the average CEO makes 300x that, then we'll say the CEO for that company makes $4.5 million/yr. The total of all the menial workers salary would be $7.5 mil./yr. Now, let's raise the worker's wage to $10 per/hr. 40 hrs. per/wk. pre tax-about $21k per Total menial salary about -$10.5 mil yr. So, total menial wages at $7 per hr. for 1 year-$7.5 million total menial wages at $10 per hr. for 1 year-$10.5 million A $3 million difference, and the CEO already makes $4.5 million, so take it out of his check, and he's down to $1.5 million per/yr. and the workers got their wage increase. The CEO could still easily pay off a 30 year mortgage on a million dollar home in 1 year, and still have several hundred thousand left over for that year. In this example the CEO would have taken a cut to only be making 100x as much as the average worker as opposed to the national average of CEO's which is making 300x. Now, I propose we have make the CEO only making 10-15x as much as the average worker. You get the point, CEO's are making way too much.
__________________
Hello, my name is Luka. I live on the 2nd floor. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|