|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-26-2009, 08:04 PM | #91 (permalink) | |
sleepe
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: boston
Posts: 1,140
|
Quote:
But Romans were great for different reasons... |
|
05-26-2009, 09:15 PM | #92 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
look who up on Wikipedia? Are you saying the Romans didn't?
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
05-26-2009, 10:22 PM | #93 (permalink) | |
Partying on the inside
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
|
Quote:
In fact, the only relationships that are prohibited between men and women in the armed forces are those between enlisted and officers, and those between non-commissioned officers and lower enlisted in the same unit. For instance: In the Army, as an E-4 or below, you would not be able to get with an E-5 or above. It's simply a matter of avoiding favoritism within a unit. (which still goes on, both racially and sexually) The homosexuality issue lies more at the heart of our still prevalent nonacceptance of the concept. When the military is involved with those matters, they are generally "allowed" to be more stringent than civilian life because of the detrimental roles of the men and women comprising such strictly controlled institutions. Regardless of the obvious contradictory nature of the whole matter in relation to heterosexuals being able to express their sexuality, not to mention how African Americans' involvement in the military became common, we're still able to recognize the fact that it will take some time before this situation is rectified. I see ourselves as a society becoming more accepting of homosexual rights and I think it's a good thing. I'm willing to bet everything that this whole issue will be resolved in time. All we can do until then is continue to educate people and provide insights into this kind of thing.
__________________
|
|
05-27-2009, 12:36 PM | #94 (permalink) | |
Seemingly Silenced
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,312
|
Quote:
|
|
05-27-2009, 12:51 PM | #95 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Really? That would have been the only branch I'd have joined too. Had an air of merit-based-promotions to it.
Thats disappointing to hear.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
05-27-2009, 12:57 PM | #96 (permalink) | |
This Space for Rent
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 815
|
Quote:
|
|
05-27-2009, 01:01 PM | #97 (permalink) |
Seemingly Silenced
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,312
|
Yeah big time. My LPO is a first class married to a master chief(totally against regulations E-6/E-9). lets just say she didn't make first class until after they were married. Thats how it goes. Attractive females have it the absolute best in todays navy.
|
05-27-2009, 01:11 PM | #98 (permalink) | |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
you'd be crazy to think there wouldn't be some hippity dippity going on.
__________________
first.am |
|
05-27-2009, 01:56 PM | #99 (permalink) |
Seemingly Silenced
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,312
|
More like upwards of 6 thousand on deployment with full air crew on board. But of course theres going to be hippity dippity going on. Just remember there's 7 hotdogs for every 1 bun... and highest rank gets first dibs. Think of it that way.
|
05-27-2009, 02:23 PM | #100 (permalink) | |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Quote:
Now what if I'm a low rank, lets say E-2, but I'm stunningly attractive. Could I get some officer tail on the sly and make like nothing happened or would said officer find out and feed me to a shark?
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
|