Should US Legalize Marijuana? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-29-2010, 11:27 AM   #381 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent & Funky View Post
I've heard "stoned" used to describe people high on drugs other than marijuana...
Such as?
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 11:35 AM   #382 (permalink)
FUNky
 
Violent & Funky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
Such as?
I don't know specifically, but they always make the parents/teachers/various old people in movies use it to describe when kids use drugs... *shrugs*
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/ohio0808

sometimes I don't thrill you
sometimes I think I'll kill you
just don't let me fuck up will you
'cause when I need a friend it's still you
Violent & Funky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 02:23 PM   #383 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Insane Guest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 1,322
Default

I think it's backwards. Stoned is something Ive heard and is always connected to Marijuana. High is a universal term.
Insane Guest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2010, 05:28 PM   #384 (permalink)
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
 
duga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
Default

I have actually heard being drunk referred to as being high once. It threw me off because I obviously thought he meant he had just smoked. So this kind of stuff just changes depending on where you go.
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph...
duga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2010, 11:26 PM   #385 (permalink)
Facilitator
 
VEGANGELICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent & Funky View Post
What's wrong with a product's only benefit being pleasure?
Nothing is wrong with pleasure...it's the negative effects of drugs that I feel are the problem: addiction, increased cancer risk, problems with perception, interference with decision making, etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanilla View Post
You really think this is going to prevent hormonal, peer pressured teens to not smoke it all the time? I think the intelligence levels of people would drop rapidly. I could smoke it all the time if I wanted, but to be honest it's not my thing. Just because it's illegal doesn't stop people who want to smoke it from smoking it.
I wonder, too, Vanilla, what effect legalization of drugs combined with a huge public education program against using them would have on the number of drug users.

I think, judging by the decrease in the number of people who smoke cigarettes in the U.S., that teaching people about why not to use marijuana, prohibiting advertisements for marijuana, and taxing it could lead to there being fewer users over time, since this is what has happened with cigarette smoking in the U.S. (Smoking Rate Is Declining in U.S. ).

In the short term, though, I think you are right that marijuana legalization would lead to increased usage. I'd rather have people stoned on marijuana than dying right and left in Mexico due to the huge drug cartels there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xEMGx View Post
I think it's backwards. Stoned is something Ive heard and is always connected to Marijuana. High is a universal term.
I agree: I always think of being "high" as what you say about someone who is under the influence of any drug in general (except alcohol). For marijuana specifically, I think of a person being either "mellowed out" with a little use, and "stoned" if heavily affected.

I think of people getting high off just plain cigarettes, though, because I always remember one of my high school friends who smoked telling me that it felt like her head was floating a couple feet above her body. So, literally, she felt high.

I never think of someone who is inebriated as "high." I think of a person who shows obvious signs of impairment due to alcohol as "drunk," and if the person is really losing mental abilities due to alcohol I think of her as "smashed."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan:
If a chicken was smart enough to be able to speak English and run in a geometric pattern, then I think it should be smart enough to dial 911 (999) before getting the axe, and scream to the operator, "Something must be done! Something must be done!"
VEGANGELICA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 06:13 AM   #386 (permalink)
Make it so
 
Scarlett O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,181
Default

I often refer to people on weed as 'baked'.
__________________
"Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots
Scarlett O'Hara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 12:33 PM   #387 (permalink)
FUNky
 
Violent & Funky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VEGANGELICA View Post
Nothing is wrong with pleasure...it's the negative effects of drugs that I feel are the problem: addiction, increased cancer risk, problems with perception, interference with decision making, etc.
Lots of legal products in this country can be described as having the same side effects...
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/ohio0808

sometimes I don't thrill you
sometimes I think I'll kill you
just don't let me fuck up will you
'cause when I need a friend it's still you
Violent & Funky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 12:39 PM   #388 (permalink)
Facilitator
 
VEGANGELICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent & Funky View Post
Lots of legal products in this country can be described as having the same side effects...
The degree of harm caused by the product is what is important, though, I feel. Caffeine, for example, isn't too harmful, though it is addictive and can give people jitters.

Cigarettes, though, *are* very bad...so my point would be that I feel the pleasure gained from cigarettes isn't a problem (reduced stress, greater relaxation?), but the harm caused by them is. For me, the harm much outweighs the benefits of cigarettes, especially since I feel there are other ways, and ones that are healthful, to achieve what I hear are the "benefits."

I do agree with you that it makes no sense to have cigarettes be legal but marijuana illegal, since their negative side effects are pretty similar, right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan:
If a chicken was smart enough to be able to speak English and run in a geometric pattern, then I think it should be smart enough to dial 911 (999) before getting the axe, and scream to the operator, "Something must be done! Something must be done!"
VEGANGELICA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 01:29 PM   #389 (permalink)
FUNky
 
Violent & Funky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
Default

Right.

Also, I don't believe it is the government's responsibility to tell me what I can and can't put into my body, but that opens a whole different discussion...
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/ohio0808

sometimes I don't thrill you
sometimes I think I'll kill you
just don't let me fuck up will you
'cause when I need a friend it's still you
Violent & Funky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2010, 05:01 PM   #390 (permalink)
Partying on the inside
 
Freebase Dali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VEGANGELICA View Post
The degree of harm caused by the product is what is important, though, I feel. Caffeine, for example, isn't too harmful, though it is addictive and can give people jitters.

Cigarettes, though, *are* very bad...so my point would be that I feel the pleasure gained from cigarettes isn't a problem (reduced stress, greater relaxation?), but the harm caused by them is. For me, the harm much outweighs the benefits of cigarettes, especially since I feel there are other ways, and ones that are healthful, to achieve what I hear are the "benefits."

I do agree with you that it makes no sense to have cigarettes be legal but marijuana illegal, since their negative side effects are pretty similar, right?
How are the negative side effects similar?
Freebase Dali is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.