|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-06-2009, 01:54 PM | #21 (permalink) | |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
it's true, there should be a strong correlation between liberalism in social and economic issues, but that doesn't mean that everybody follows that mantra. look at Ron Paul, he's an enormous proponent for a laissez-faire market but he's very liberal socially at the same time. and no, there shouldn't be an equal distribution throughout the plot. inasmuch the same way as Democrats outnumber Republicans.
__________________
first.am |
|
04-06-2009, 02:21 PM | #22 (permalink) | ||
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Quote:
Quote:
It should be relativly equal because while parties mean different things, and are package deals that win based on marketing strategies, political philosophy isn't, especially when its as disjointed at the questioning was here. I'm still not coming to grips with what purple would look like in practicum.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
||
04-06-2009, 02:28 PM | #24 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Montana has social programs?
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
04-06-2009, 03:13 PM | #29 (permalink) | |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Quote:
I don't know **** about the Swiss but if they have socialized medicine and free college tuition I'd imagine it would be them.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
|
04-06-2009, 03:16 PM | #30 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
|
|
|