![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You should watch the video before you post with the idea that its bull****. Then you can post and attempt to debunk it. Or you could make posts based on what you know. Im not asking you to say omg were all doomed i just figure it couldnt hurt. Also with so many ppl with your ideas it would be even easier to do what you think is bull****.... |
Yukon, no good will come out of questioning Obamas rule. You should forget about it, or else you're gonna find yourself in deep waters .. this is way over your head.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not to be mean but is that more important... The reason i am here is an attempt to inform on information i already know... I agree with you on the fact that it is for you to decipher but that's hard to do without the info provided. I still appreciate your thoughts... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
your IQ is based on your ability to retain information not what you know.
|
Quote:
|
Does that make mine better than yours, no cause i bet you wont say that again... IQ's were designed to find learning problems in kids and things like that. Yes you may figure things out faster but it doesn't mean your more educated on something you know nothing about...
|
Quote:
And yes i do know what your talking about.. I cant say your wrong just like you cant say im wrong, I just find it hard for you to debate with me on something that you havent seen... Kinda like if ppl were discussing a movie that you hadnt seen you would obviously stay out of the conversation. Thats whats going on here if i am not mistaken... You still seem headstrong and thats cool but your argument is fueled by one side of the coin... Who really knows but why not find out ?? |
Let's say hypothetically that everything in that documentary is true, wouldn't those who question the new world order be the first up against the wall? Be smart, don't worry about it.
|
Quote:
Either way I would consider that its just another possibility and am sharing that with you. The way i see you would rather pretend that it is all good. I wont stay up long hours and worry either but I do like to know. |
Yukon here's what you're going to do. You're going to state the main points and thesis of this two hour video and then intelligently argue you it with me. If you can do this I won't lock all your threads and treat all your posts in this forum as spam and therefore a bannable offense.
|
Let me put it this way:
I voted for Obama and in doing so carried with me a great deal of hope that our country was on its way to recovery. I am not a republican and I would probably consider myself as radically liberal as they come. I was more aptly prepared to see the movie because I've seen Zeitgeist which does a lot to explain the reality of this country's political and non-political power structure and the hidden dynamics behind some of the most notable events in American history. I started watching The Obama Deception with a great deal of trepidation and skepticism. I personally did not want anything negative that was going to be said about Obama our his current administration to be true and I actively sought out anything that seemed to be even remotely lacking in credibility. the truth is that the movie and the facts presented are more credible than I would have wanted them to be, and the only reason I did'nt walk away sick to my stomach is because , as I said, Zeitgeist had given me some preparation for this film. I personally believe that its futile to debate with anyone hasn't or wont watch this documentary. I think that's Yukon's main error in this. Yet on the other hand Yukon did start this thread with the stipulation that no one should post without first watching it yet that's what everyone did! I'm the only one besides Yukon that watched the film and I'm the only one besides him who believes it. Its not a matter of Yukon being gullible or a conspiracy theorist; their not his ideas there the ideas of a well documented film with facts that are backed up by credible sources. If you'd prefer not to alter your paradigm of the reality of the political and economic systems of the country don't watch the film and don't post in a thread that tells you not to if you havent. |
Quote:
The first and most obvious point... Obama is the Change that Americans needed. With promises of hope, jobs, troops coming home, not to mention keeping lobbyist and donors out of his administration etc... That's great but if you look at the things he has done thus far its completely opposite. Basically he was the perfect fit in a time of need, I agreed originally, but now see that I just like most of America was duped by false promises. If you didnt like bush your going to Hate Obama.. Ill tell you what if you kick me out over this thread and you start realizing that you cant wait for someone else in the white house in about 3 years then I feel that should be my ticket back not that it means that much to me I think it would just be nice to say I told you so. The other side to the coin is that everything is getting better... As we bail all these companies out that are falling down Americas debt gets larger, and the banking elite get richer. The other point was that the economic recession is obviously done intentionally, this obviously not the first. You see with the economy at its peak everyone has everything they could possibly want, when things change such as fuel prices, which had no reason to go up it makes everything more expensive. Food, gas, natural gas, plastics, automobiles... Then what happens??Standards change ppl cant afford what they have anymore and then Kaboom .. Now you have people taking out loans even though they cant afford to pay them back, gas prices are worth more that a gallon of milk so people cant afford to drive there vehicles anymore, now they cant purchase vehicles either car companies going down... These loans most took out were to avoid bankruptcy, they got loans while there credit score sub par, and some even good and it only jammed them farther into debt and if the people cant afford to pay the bank back the bank goes down... then you have to line the pockets of the banking elite so they can buy up more banks so on and so forth. Not to mention the cost of war, but he we were promised the troops would come home, I guess that means send 30000 more over there and double our presence, to only further line the pockets of the greedy. Point 3 Right now if you read the current events, you will notice that gitmo is going to be shut down that was a promise as it was not civil. However it gets worse, now you just have different locations were these ppl will be tortured and that's all good with you know who. It was quoted that is was essential to have such facilities. Point 4.. The need for a civilian army.. Whats wrong with the national reserve and the Coast Guard?? Im in one of them wont tell you which that's besides the point, and thanks for my paycheck sucker. Either way the need for a civilian army?? The points are valid, as you and I both know and can both agree that we will never really know the bigger picture until it smacks us in the face. Think about this, around the US right now they are strengthening prisons and fema is building camps all over the country?? I want to know why? And how come we need 20000 or so army men patroling the us?? Because ppl need protection? Nah we all have guns.. But not for long well nothing worth shooting at anyone... Its obvious, because once people start to see the belly of the beast its going to be anarchy in the us... Worst than watts around this mother Fugger... How about you? what will you do? Hell I might be having to push you along if you get out of hand who knows DOD dir 1404.10 that would be obamas personal million strong army notice the directive states that they would stay away from the office work and be a soldier, that would be all his, and if you look at it they are there to flock the anarchists who will protest the hell out of this once the see it, you should be able to choose unless you are in a draft which we are not, but i guess its cool to enslave ourselfs ... You by the way have yet to state where you are from... So pardon me if you are form somewhere other than the US. 5. Don't mind me on this one but if there are two sides to the coin should you ban me for having different feelings than you?? Food for thought. 6. Before long We wont be alble to discuss these things because the "fairness doc" is about to limit the infomation availible to you via the mass media. That right there should piss you off. You will see this happen not just to the internet, but any form of media. 7. Dictation of health Care. By pushing federal funded health care you will not longer have the options that you used to. You can look at it as a good thing if you want but how can you regulate health care... This will make jobs go straight to hell, ... And by the way my health care when i say my i mean mine not my depns.. SUCKS. Im talking needles breaking off into ppls arms for just a simple hiv test... Multiple stabs to hit the sweet spot since there education on heath care is the same as the sound a fart makes... 8.Africon?? Why would we need that.. I say this assuming you have heard of that.. To take over the resources FROM EVERYONE THERE.. I will finish tomorrow i have to go to bed.... etc btw |
OK I'm going to take a stab at doing the same thing with hopefully a lot more clarity and credibility. give me a few.....
|
I can't watch this crap. It was funny even compared to American Zeitgeist though (with problem less than half the few facts that actually had.) I mean for fucks sake, they said Obama wanted to federalize the states! How moronic is that? Before you even argue perhaps you should post these "facts" backed up by "credible sources."
|
What is africon? What is fairness doc? What's up with the national civilian army? You wrote many words, Yukon, but I'm having a hard time understanding all of it. I think you should try and explain it to those not from America. We don't know about all the changes you are going through.
My last two posts before this were actually jokes, but I guess they flew under the radar. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also he has inspired many Americans and made them hope, so he did come true on that promise (which is a difficult one to make because you can't force it.) His economic action has ultimately been the stimulus package, you can't judge whether or not he's created jobs yet. Silly criticism. And now we get to a central theme through this argument sources sources sources! What lobbyists and donors has he appointed? Quote:
Quote:
Also since you're making a claim that goes directly against he known history of the economic crisis you might want to disprove what has been reported for the last ten years in regards to the economy. I suggest you go back and look at some Depression-era legislation and if it's still enact today, then examine what all Clinton/Greenspan did and then Bush and also look at each of the banks and how they've failed and see if they really did all those stupid things like give out bad loans or it's just a big bad lie constructed by Obama. Quote:
Quote:
Obama isn't shipping them off to different camps (sources and locations.) That wouldn't work now anyway seeing as groups like the Red Cross and various humanitarian groups are now far too tangled into the treatment of the prisoners to allow that sort of thing. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
The Democrats and by extension Obama, haven't even been pushing it anyway. All the talk of it came from conservative pundits like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity who were trying to twist the policy for what it really was. Admittedly it's understandable; they wouldn't be allowed to do things like call Obama a Communist, refer to him as a negro or compare him to Hitler. Anyway your entire explanation of the Fairness doctrine is a lie and shows your own ignorance. It doesn't even apply to citizen's speeches laws or the availability of information. It only applies to how the major media presents that information. Quote:
I'd also like to add many people voted for Obama and support the Democratic party purely because of their stance on health care reform and more importantly a more universal system. It's one of their key party platforms and is largely why I lean towards the way the Democrats govern as opposed to the Republicans. Quote:
Now onto a little bit of advice. You need to figure out what the exact thesis of the movie is. I only watched about ten minutes of it and read some things on it and even I realize that the thesis has more to do with Obama being a puppet than the anti-Christ and doer of all evil. For one there is no conspiracy theorist cynical enough to try and convince you that Obama has been active in politics long enough or that he's influential enough to have brought these problems (some of them five years coming, some of them thirty) upon America. However when you read your post...it's not clear what you're trying to argue. I'd also encourage you to source outrageous claims you may even find this movie is deliberately misleading. Again I only saw ten minutes but in those ten minutes I spotted several distorted points and lies. Right off the bat they started talking about a Civilian National Security Force as if it was a call to create a secret police. Obama was talking about funding and having just as much activity in groups like the Peace Corps (who are no secret police) as in the army! It was a call to be a positive force in your community and in the world and finding out about that speech actually made me think more of Obama's approach to foreign policy then I did prior to this (though I still don't think much of it; it was better than McCain's though.) Quote:
|
Quote:
People repeatedly asked him to present the film's argument in a concise form, and to his credit he did. Sleepy Jack humoured him with a legitimate rebuttal, and he gets to try again. |
I was half asleep when I wrote this so you have to give me a chance...
Yes this video was to show you that he is not worth getting all excited over, He follows all the same plans as Bush... And its funny to how silly people got over him. either way I will explain better later. |
That's fair, but I do have to say that Yukon's synopsis of the film had little to nothing to do with the video and I feel he ignored most of its central arguments. What he did choose to highlight made no sense or wasn't even a part of the video. I would go through the process, but I feel I have wisdom and intelligence enough to choose my battles, and I sincerely do hope that I am just buying into a load of rubbish.
|
Quote:
This is to sleepy... I was not talking about Obama banning my thoughts... I was talking about you.. Don't mind me on this one but if there are two sides to the coin should you ban me for having different feelings than you?? Food for thought He can't ban your thoughts; that's just impossible. Accusing him of trying to do that is just being silly. As he himself said; he isn't the Messiah. He has no magic powers. He is just a charismatic leader. |
I never even implied I was going to ban your thoughts. I only stated that you're either going to abide by the rules and standards of this forum or I'm going to start treating all your posts as spam. Post your rebuttal.
|
Sleepy...
Thomas Jefferson wrote.. "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties then standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802) Why such a strong statement? Because it is absolutely true. The Banking elite will have duped us all... Until someone can prove me wrong which by the way is impossible to do I will remain in this state of mind though not loosing sleep... These people will squeeze the life out of all of us, take our money and security its only obvious that its happening now and will continue to happen. Then they will provide you with the basic essentials (starting with your health care) then make you believe everything if affordable until your choices are reduced into their plan. They don't care about you!! These are the people funded our Brand new presidents Campaign. Our tax dollars are not being used for bail outs. The Federal Reserve (this law evading privately owned company) printed and gave it to banks. Guess who owns 80% of AIG now?? These smaller banks were taken under deliberately on loose very loose loans... A man panhandling one day could go buy a house the next (exaggerated but really) Who does that anyway NOBODY .. The problem is they weren't bums when they originally got the loan .. They were reduced into bums when everything started to make less sense. Blame the Chevy Yukon all you want but this was not the reason. It was a design not a problem. Now they will help them with there dues and interest in mind until there monopoly is complete... "I know how hard it is to be seen helping out banks right now", "Especially when everyone is suffering in part for their bad decisions," " I know I get it" B. Obama |
Let us examine one particular statement here:
Quote:
Now from a technical perspective it is impossible to prove your claims wrong because they're unsubstantiated; meaning there's nothing there to disprove. I asked you to provide sources. You provide a Thomas Jefferson quote then misinterpreted it because the government and banking institutions are not one, nor do the banking institutions control currency (ultimately what Jefferson describes is the Federal Reserve's job.) Do the financial institutions have too much economic influence? Absolutely - but that is capitalism for you. Now before you even comment on the Federal Reserve you need to read the Federal Reserve act and understand how it operates. It isn't a privately owned law evading companies, it's a quasi-public system that is ultimately held accountable by the government and by extension the people (this is a democracy.) Just because Americans are too fat and lazy to examine what the Federal Reserve does and how it has been operating doesn't mean it's been hidden from view. We all knew there was a bubble in the housing market; Greenspan even stated he felt every American having a home was worth any slight economic problems in the future. There has been no hidden plot to overthrow the economy. There has been a build up to this downturn since the days of Thatcher and Reagan and the policy of major world leaders since then have, for the most part, done nothing to prevent this crisis. You can see all the pieces in the policies of Prime Ministers, Parliaments, Presidents and Congress - not in the hidden agenda of some fictitious banking elites. Now to once again get to your posting style. You didn't even try and argue any of the points I made nor did you provide any sources. I told you if you wanted to keep posting in here you would abide by basic rules of debate. I am being lenient in this and I'm not holding you to very high standards however I expect you to to at least be able to preform basic argument tasks that your average eleven year old could do. When I asked you for a rebuttal I meant that you needed to counter my arguments which were counting all your original points. You didn't do this; in fact you ignored my entire post and started talking about a Thomas Jefferson quote. I asked for you to provide sources for your absurd claims. You didn't do this either. I'm not doing this to be condescending; I'm trying to help you. Right now you look like a rambling idiot and a liar (I pointed out this flat out lie you told and you ignored that as well. Though in your defense, though this only shows how critical your mind is, you based this false opinion off what the documentary espoused.) If you're not going to argue with credibility and coherency then you're not going to post in here. You have yet to offer any evidence that this banking elite exists, what their manifesto of sorts is, or explain how they've had global control. If you're not going to do that stop wasting my time, your time and every else in this section of the board's time. |
#1 From reading your replies you are always condescending, so much to the point that most ppl wont be combative with you... I think you rely on this tactic very well with your constant attacks of Lets make this simple for you you have the intellect of a 11 year old ect... Your constant usage of unusually large words that are only masking your true self and when broken down rely on the old "shut up" tactic.. I agree oldie but a good one. Answering to you is like answering a brick wall... I must also make notice that you are very good at convincing people to follow in your footsteps... I've noticed your puppets... I have also noticed the ones that are afraid to post up mumbling out of there suppressed azzes.. I will agree you know your stuff but your a real $%^& about it. ... I say yes you say no and you have no bending point what so ever. As stated above brick wall
Quote:
Quote:
So I guess you contradict yourself willingly. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
By nobody, I would assume that you mean the people who are making trillions of dollars that have no reason to change there plan... After all would you? |
If I'm an asshole at least I'm an asshole who knows how to argue. Your response (and I'm using this term loosely and generously) makes no sense.
|
Quote:
|
Or beat around "the bush"... I mean "the Obama" I'm sorry about that
|
Because it's full of vague and fragmented statements with no coherency. I can't respond to anything in it because I have no clue what you're even trying to say. This is the sort of thoughtless-freshly-pulled-out-of-ass posts I have been talking about. They're disruptive, idiotic and irrelevant.
|
Quote:
|
I've already told you; your entire post.
|
Quote:
|
No what you're going to do is respond to the political nature of my argument in a more intelligent manner or I'm going to start marking your posts as spam. I've warned you several times now and you're still refusing to engage this forum with any maturity.
|
Quote:
I understand I made the mistake of not summarizing it for you or anyone else... This is something I agree I need to work on. I just don't understand how that doesn't make sense. I haven't gone above your head. #1 You basically say I should be afraid to use what is against me. I state freedom of speech #2 You say I have no proof to voice such a conspiracy... We both used the media to base our opinions, thus contradicting yourself. #3 You state the Fed res is a quasi-public system and voiced the obvious text book details. I told you what they did... #4 You state "Greenspan even stated he felt every American having a home was worth any slight economic problems in the future.. Now that you have edited this it makes no sense where before you said "deserved" Don't try to lie about that it will show weakness /understanding... #5 You basically tell me that nobody has had enough time to fix this problem..With the economic highs and lows... The survey says That greedy palms wont let this repetitious cycle invade their standard of living.. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.