|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-21-2009, 05:44 PM | #31 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 625
|
Quote:
__________________
Attempting to find a cure for Stupid... |
|
03-21-2009, 05:58 PM | #32 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
.. are you sure about this?
__________________
Something Completely Different |
03-21-2009, 08:00 PM | #34 (permalink) |
MB's Biggest Fanboy
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 2,852
|
The thought that all life must be oxygen dependent is a bit naive. Organisms on earth evolved to use oxygen because there was a large amount of it and it was useful. Organisms of different home worlds would surely evolve to take advantage of whatever useful elements are present.
|
03-21-2009, 08:04 PM | #35 (permalink) | |
What a guy
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 2,123
|
Quote:
Anaerobic organism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
last.fm |
|
03-21-2009, 08:57 PM | #36 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 625
|
Quote:
__________________
Attempting to find a cure for Stupid... |
|
03-21-2009, 08:59 PM | #37 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
There are lots of anaerobic microorganisms .. It's generally believed that in the first half of earth's history, there wasn't much oxygen around and so early life was not oxygen dependent. Then there's a hypothesis that cyanobacteria, bacterias that are capable of (oxygenic) photosynthesis are "responsible" for first adding over time large amounts of oxygen to our atmosphere as it is a byproduct of photosynthesis.
edit : As for that thing being a bacteria. Well, aside from other logical problems, bacterias are unicellular and generally very small. Much smaller than eukaryotic ("animal") cells. I guess that one would be a bit big for a cell
__________________
Something Completely Different |
03-23-2009, 11:19 AM | #39 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 625
|
Another interesting topic would be to plant trees (in a controlled enviroment) on mars and have it let off greenhouse gasses to in turn warm the atmosphere and support life as we know it.
__________________
Attempting to find a cure for Stupid... |
03-23-2009, 01:59 PM | #40 (permalink) |
isfckingdead
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
|
It's an interesting idea Bradbury (and would make a great science fiction novel, oh wait) but not a realistic one. Trees need oxygen, nutrients and water in order to grow even if you gave them a controlled environment and had them growing in some sort of giant bubble once you took that away they'd just die (ignoring what they need to survive) because there's no protection from cosmic radiation or ultraviolet light like there is on Earth.
|
|