|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Physical punishment aganist children. Acceptable or Unacceptable? | |||
Acceptable | 50 | 56.82% | |
Unacceptable | 38 | 43.18% | |
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-02-2011, 04:32 PM | #492 (permalink) |
The Music Guru.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
|
In fact, I do own a dictionary, and under corporal punishment it says: Physical punishment, such as smacking, caning, or whipping. So to me, it seems as though smacking somebody - even lightly - to punish them in some way, is a form of corporal punishment. I'm curious as to how you came to the conclusion that smacking a child lightly is not corporal punishment.
|
02-02-2011, 04:40 PM | #493 (permalink) |
art is sold for money
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 730
|
I think that a lot of kids do things they shouldn't just because they know they can get away with it. Example: A child deserves to be physically punished if he/she is, let's say, torturing an animal, bullying another kid or something like that. However, I don't think that a child should be beaten if he/she, for example, gets a B on an exam, or doesn't do homework (which some parents I know do)
__________________
Last.fm The Music I make http://www.indabamusic.com/opportuni...missions/52856 |
02-02-2011, 04:46 PM | #494 (permalink) | ||
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Quote:
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
||
02-02-2011, 05:00 PM | #495 (permalink) |
Quiet Man in the Corner
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pocono Mountains
Posts: 2,480
|
I would if I absolutely had to. But like fighting, I think violence usually comes as a result of mental weakness. I intend to weight my teachings more on the fact that if they do the right thing, they will be rewarded. As opposed to if you they do the wrong thing, they will get punished.
|
02-02-2011, 05:01 PM | #496 (permalink) | ||
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Quote:
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
||
02-02-2011, 05:07 PM | #497 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
It very much depends on the case and context, but I think commonly, you're looking at something from a fine up to 1 year prison for excercise of violence towards someone like your kid. If you've damaged the kid, for example breaking an arm or caused him or her a lot of pain (whatever a lot is), then I think you may be looking at 4 years prison or more.
Quote:
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
02-02-2011, 05:40 PM | #498 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 981
|
Wow, possibly a year in prison for light smacking. That is laughable in my eyes, I can't believe that is actually a law.
As far as the studies go, I had looked stuff up like that before and I can't bring myself to put too much stock into the results. There are just too many variables to consider. Like one study said about how low-income, lower-class parents are more likely to hit their children. Are their behavioral problems as teens and young adults because of the spankings or is it other factors, perhaps an unstable family structure, or effects of poverty or something like that? I feel like the term "corporal punishment" is too broad for what we are really talking about here. I don't even want to use the term because everyone can realize the big difference between light spanking and whipping your kid with a belt. It's like using the term "drugs" when there is obviously a big difference between smoking weed and smoking meth. So of course I think "corporal punishment" is going to lead to problems for people down the road, because the term includes everything from light spanking to beating a kid with a broomstick or punching them or something. All I know is that spanking your kid is pretty normal around here and nobody seems to have a problem with it. I know kids that were beaten by their fathers who DID grow up to have violence issues. But I don't see how light spanking at a young age would lead to growing up and abusing alcohol, hitting your wife, etc. I knew in my early teen years that I deserved the spankings that I got as a child, and it helped teach me right from wrong. I was easily able to understand why I was spanked and that hurting or injuring me was not the idea behind it. It was to teach me a lesson and I am grateful for it. At a young age, when cognitive abilities and critical thinking is still limited, I feel like the best way to teach someone is by spanking them. Sometimes telling kids "no" doesn't work, they don't understand or care. |
02-02-2011, 05:55 PM | #499 (permalink) | |||
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Quote:
Quote:
So, the "it helped me learn right from wrong" point, which has been made a number of times, has little very relevance and actually seems ridiculously ironic/hypocritical from here. Quote:
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|||
|