Lets just bail out the world (techno, country, American, effect) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2009, 01:45 PM   #11 (permalink)
Existential Egoist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,468
Default

It wouldn't be 4.00 a gallon if there were no taxes. There is way to much regulation in the business world from minimum wage to anti-trust laws.
Inuzuka Skysword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 01:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
Oh my gosh, no one could have thought of that! You tell people to hand you things. You believe their property belongs to you. You think that big businesses should cater for you. Join the rest of the stupid liberals.
If a business wants to succeed it should actually cater to a certain extent to the populace.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
The only greed here is the idea that we should all have to make up for the mistake of others. I just find it funny how everyone doesn't want to bail out the big businesses which provide all the welfare that a ton of this country is living on in the first place. American liberalism is so hypocritical.
That's not greed Oxford and these businesses (e.g. the auto industry) haven't been making money; in fact they've been losing it. Bush has been giving tax cut to big business anyway. A good deal of Democrats in Wasington (Kucinich for instance) have been strongly against the bail outs and even Clinton's been saying they're going about this wrong and if they are going to do bail out companies they need to (and they only did this with AIG) buy the majority of the stocks and collect enough interest so the tax payers actually make money in the long run.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
Yes, but you make those big businesses big based on your own free choice to buy from them. Nobody should be catering anybody. You pay for their product, then they give it to you. Then you go back to life. Both parties agreed to a price for the item, and that item is sold for that price.

No one is a slave to anyone. Financial situations should not force people into slavery.
Once again if a business doesn't even try and cater to a populace it's not going to sell anything. This is basic supply and demand here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
I have stated I am against the bail out. My point is the fact that you are blaming the bail out on big businesses taking risks. Sorry, the bail out is a cause of the government meddling with the economy.
Wrong. For one these bail outs ARE the government meddling with the economy. The causes of these businesses needing the bail outs is do to their own stupidity. In the case of the auto industry it had nothing to do with the government meddling with their business model it has to do with them making shitty cars. In fact if the government had stepped in like the rest of the world is and told the auto industry to start making smart cars a decade ago they'd be in much better shape. As for the financial industry if During the Clinton years they hadn't repealed Glass-Steagall all these facets of that industry wouldn't be effected. Lack of government regulation and intervention has more do with this then not.

I understand you libertarians want to blame everything on the government being too big but that's simply stupid in this case. Clinton and Bush and the Congress and Senate under them have been getting rid of things set up during the Great Depression for the past ten years as well as deregulating businesses (though this part was more Bush than Clinton.) It clearly hasn't been a good thing. I don't know how you can honestly say these bail outs are the cause of the government meddling with the economy seeing as everything that's happened points to the opposite.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 02:16 PM   #13 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Yukon Cornelius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 625
Default

Yeah the taxes on gas hasent really changed since you bought your first gallon at 99 cents or less for some of you.

I actually believe it has more to do with all the shartty loans that were givin out. Ok now you have a person that 2 years ago could apply for a loan and now they cant. Which might not be a bad thing!!! Now the 55 about to retire man that made an honest living is losing his job because his company made cuts. Shart...
__________________
Attempting to find a cure for Stupid...
Yukon Cornelius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 02:25 PM   #14 (permalink)
Existential Egoist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepy jack View Post
If a business wants to succeed it should actually cater to the populace.
I agree. What you want to do is hold a gun to a business man's head and tell him to cater. I say that the man should cater and succeed if he wants to. If he doesn't then he doesn't succeed.


Quote:
That's not greed Oxford and these businesses (e.g. the auto industry) haven't been making money; in fact they've been losing it. A good deal of Democrats in Wasington (Kucinich for instance) have been strongly against the bail outs and even Clinton's been saying they're going about this wrong and if they are going to do bail out companies they need to (and they only did this with AIG) buy the majority of the stocks and collect enough interest so the tax payers actually make money in the long run.
This is attacking a point that I am pretty sure I didn't make. The points I made were:
  • The government is forcing taxpayers to pay for a failed business that has nothing to do with me (the individual).
  • American liberalism is hypocritical because they don't want to bail out companies that pay taxes to their welfare.

Number two was a generalization, but it is true for a lot of people.

Quote:
Once again if a business doesn't even try and cater to a populace it's not going to sell anything. This is basic supply and demand here.
Again, I don't want to force businesses into catering to anyone. That is slavery.

Quote:
Wrong. For one these bail outs ARE the government meddling with the economy. The causes of these businesses needing the bail outs is do to their own stupidity. In the case of the auto industry it had nothing to do with the government meddling with their business model it has to do with them making ****ty cars. In fact if the government had stepped in like the rest of the world is and told the auto industry to start making smart cars a decade ago they'd be in much better shape. As for the financial industry if During the Clinton years they hadn't repealed Glass-Steagall all these facets of that industry wouldn't be effected. Lack of government regulation and intervention has more do with this then not.
Nobody would have to bail out anybody if there was no welfare. The thing is, America runs on the taxes of the upper class/middle class. If the only people who were going to lose out were stockholders/people related to the business then this wouldn't have happened. However, we have entangled each other into our lives with welfare. A lot of people are now depending on other people to work for them. It isn't like it is voluntary either. It is at gun point.

Secondly, freer economies bring more successful businesses. Our economy has never been a completely free economy. In fact, what we live under right now is VERY restricted capitalism. So the notion that businesses fail under capitalism is false because we operate under the absolute worst economic system, moderated capitalism or mixed economy.

Quote:
I understand you libertarians want to blame everything on the government being too big but that's simply stupid in this case. Clinton and Bush and the Congress and Senate under them have been getting rid of things set up during the Great Depression for the past ten years as well as deregulating businesses (though this part was more Bush than Clinton.) It clearly hasn't been a good thing. I don't know how you can honestly say these bail outs are the cause of the government meddling with the economy seeing as everything that's happened points to the opposite.
They are not deregulating enough. Moderated capitalism is worse than socialism.
Inuzuka Skysword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 02:27 PM   #15 (permalink)
dontcareaboutyou
 
swim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,188
Default

Man we should go back to how things were in the '20s. Yea.
__________________
http://nakednaps.bandcamp.com/
swim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 03:09 PM   #16 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,565
Default

this thread = ethan vs inuzuka

Quote:
Originally Posted by swim View Post
Man we should go back to how things were in the '20s. Yea.
may i have this dance, my lovely flapper?
anticipation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 04:36 PM   #17 (permalink)
snickers
 
Trauma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: detroit
Posts: 2,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
It wouldn't be 4.00 a gallon if there were no taxes. There is way to much regulation in the business world from minimum wage to anti-trust laws.
Okay Ayn Rand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
They are not deregulating enough. Moderated capitalism is worse than socialism.
The U.S.???
And what does "moderated capitalism is worse than socialism" even mean?

Is socialism an inherently bad idea?

Definition:
a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

Sounds like your only beef is wanting to have Adam Smith's children.
__________________
A mi no me importa nada
Para mi la vida es un sueño
Trauma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 05:06 PM   #18 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Yukon Cornelius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swim View Post
Man we should go back to how things were in the '20s. Yea.
Good lord...
__________________
Attempting to find a cure for Stupid...
Yukon Cornelius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 06:05 PM   #19 (permalink)
Registered Jimmy Rustler
 
Dr_Rez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
I have stated I am against the bail out. My point is the fact that you are blaming the bail out on big businesses taking risks. Sorry, the bail out is a cause of the government meddling with the economy.
Your right, the conservative view is perfect. Who would want the government raising minimum wage, staying out of wars we shouldn't be in, and giving the people health care. That would just be stupid.

Almost every big recession and war has happened on a Republicans watch. Just look at the 3 depressions this country has been in. Big business is the newest for a capitalism in the United States. If you actually think they should not cater to the public thats absurd. When there working conditions are **** and they pay less than the rising cost of living I would say that's a bad thing. As Wayfarer said, they have proven themselves incompetent and unable to run things on there own because of corporate greed and bad decision making.
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*
Dr_Rez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 06:30 PM   #20 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Yukon Cornelius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
It wouldn't be 4.00 a gallon if there were no taxes. There is way to much regulation in the business world from minimum wage to anti-trust laws.
Agreed, however the same amount of tax is applied as it was when gas was below a dollar. Yes they are making more of course as crude oil prices rise but its still the same amount which is why gas is now lower than it has been in about 3 to 4 years.

Of course the rising number of jobs lost and cars repo'ed probably has ppl doing a f ton of walking. that in its own right snuffs the demand.
__________________
Attempting to find a cure for Stupid...
Yukon Cornelius is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.