I know everything about everything. - Debate me about anything. (50 cent, quote)

[The Unfan]

And go...

[Surell]

Why did 50 Cent's stupid ass decide to battle Wu Tang?

Debate on 50's side. Dare ya.

[The Unfan]

50 decided to DO BATTLE with Wu because he is a dumbass man child looking for publicity. Thats about the best way to sum it up that I can think of.

[Surell]

Originally Posted by The Unfan

50 decided to DO BATTLE with Wu because he is a dumbass man child looking for publicity. Thats about the best way to sum it up that I can think of.

I thought you would argue on 50's side.

[The Unfan]

Originally Posted by Surell

I thought you would argue on 50's side.

Since I hate both acts I'll try. 50 Cent made a passive joke in one of his songs, whatever member of Wu got butthurt and cried about it in a song. This sparked a very long and heated short lived rivalry.

[Surell]

Originally Posted by The Unfan

Since I hate both acts I'll try. 50 Cent made a passive joke in one of his songs, whatever member of Wu got butthurt and cried about it in a song. This sparked a very long and heated short lived rivalry.

You're a good man, even if I like Wu Tang.

[khfreek]

Originally Posted by The Unfan

This sparked a very long and heated short lived rivalry.

Does this mean 50 Cent and the Wu Tang Clan have had time travelling technology all this time and didn't tell us? Bastards...

[mr dave]

Originally Posted by The Unfan

And go...

does time have a linear existence if we aren't here to measure it?

[The Unfan]

Originally Posted by mr dave

does time have a linear existence if we aren't here to measure it?

Assuming time is linear, yes. It isn't like if we stopped existing everything else would stop existing with it, just our perception of it. However as long as events happen, even without anything to witness or measure them, there is necessarily a time at which it happened. Human activity and perception do not determine the existence of nor the order in which events happen. With or without us time would remain the same.

Originally Posted by dac

Debate and win all of WendyCal's arguments to Sleepy Jack... And GO!

Thats the easy part. The hard part would be doing it without him banning me.

Originally Posted by goldenlaw

If life was a snail and it was surrounded by salt who do you believe would play santa in the year 2042 ?

John Edlund.

[cardboard adolescent]

Originally Posted by The Unfan

Assuming time is linear, yes. It isn't like if we stopped existing everything else would stop existing with it, just our perception of it. However as long as events happen, even without anything to witness or measure them, there is necessarily a time at which it happened. Human activity and perception do not determine the existence of nor the order in which events happen. With or without us time would remain the same.

What is an event? For an even to be an event, does it not need to be observed? That seems to be implicit in the definition. If everything we know is the result of observation, how can we possibly know what is beyond the realm of observation? Also, you say that human activity cannot determine the order in which events occur. That's just not true, Einstein proved that there was no such thing as synchronicity and that seeing two events as simultaneous depends on your reference frame/speed.