Oh yay, another political thread! (Prop 8, gay marriage stuff)

[adidasss]

Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog

I'm translating it from Spanish, and I don't know how to bring it into "cunt" yet.

Plain English would suffice...

Also, I think you're a moron and you have zero idea how the legal process works.

I'd ask you to explain it to me, but there wouldn't be much point with your current state of literacy. Maybe you could ask some of your better educated friends to proofread it?

[IamAlejo]

Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog

The rest of the definition. So Marriage is the same as a large roll of duct tape?

The "bond" issue is what I need defined.

I had searched for a more legal definition before I posted that but was lazy and it wasn't one of my first finds.

I'm assuming you mean the legal rights you obtain through marriage? If so, California allows just about all of these rights to *** and lesbian couples already...just doesn't allow the use of the term marriage.

[TheBig3]

Originally Posted by IamAlejo

I had searched for a more legal definition before I posted that but was lazy and it wasn't one of my first finds.

I'm assuming you mean the legal rights you obtain through marriage? If so, California allows just about all of these rights to *** and lesbian couples already...just doesn't allow the use of the term marriage.

no the rights come with the title. I want to know what the title means.

If its between a man and a woman, I want to know what the "it" is. Whats between a man anda woman. The bond? Only the bond?

[TheBig3]

Originally Posted by adidasss

Plain English would suffice...


I'd ask you to explain it to me, but there wouldn't be much point with your current state of literacy. Maybe you could ask some of your better educated friends to proofread it?

I'd write more slowly if I had all day too. I'm at work my friend, i'm running in and out of the office. Someday you'll understand little buddy.

Also, no ones better educated than I am. You wait till I speak your language.

[IamAlejo]

Ignoring the legal rights, I'd assume "it" is the state acknowledging the legality of the "permanent" [ay, not so much anymore] bond between two people.

[TheBig3]

See this is why words matter.

If its a permenant bond, then other things that are permenant must be required to either be called Marriage or not be permenant.

Can two men enter into a business partnership then? Thats a bond right? Does it have to have an end date?

I'll spell this out more clearly because some Croats might be reading; You can't start passing legislation without know what it is you're putting into law.

I think if we get down to it, marriage is going to have a spiritual connotation. At which point, I think we can both agree the law has no place in. Without a spiritual nature, i'm not sure waht Marriage is.

[IamAlejo]

Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog

See this is why words matter.

If its a permenant bond, then other things that are permenant must be required to either be called Marriage or not be permenant.

Can two men enter into a business partnership then? Thats a bond right? Does it have to have an end date?

I'll spell this out more clearly because some Croats might be reading; You can't start passing legislation without know what it is you're putting into law.

I think if we get down to it, marriage is going to have a spiritual connotation. At which point, I think we can both agree the law has no place in. Without a spiritual nature, i'm not sure waht Marriage is.

I'm not sure what you're getting at. It all depends in the contract you sign. When you get married, you sign a contract. When you form a business partnership, you sign a contract. The nature of the contracts are quite different.

[TheBig3]

People on these boards just can not handle my mind blowing metaphors.

You're looking at that backwards. This is in the context of the bond. I want to know whats bonded in Marriage, and if its just simply a bond, is this restricting other bonds?

If the nature is different, explain that one.

[adidasss]

Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog

I think if we get down to it, marriage is going to have a spiritual connotation. At which point, I think we can both agree the law has no place in. Without a spiritual nature, i'm not sure waht Marriage is.

The civil institution of marriage is regulated by the state because it has specific social benefits, namely promoting stability in the relationship which has positive effects on the partners and society as a whole, not the least of which is creating a stable environment for child rearing.

[IamAlejo]

Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog

People on these boards just can not handle my mind blowing metaphors.

You're looking at that backwards. This is in the context of the bond. I want to know whats bonded in Marriage, and if its just simply a bond, is this restricting other bonds?

If the nature is different, explain that one.

Why don't you explore a marriage contract in California and a business contract to form a partnership in the state? I'm not going to do all the searching for you, if you are wondering the difference search it for yourself.

The restrictions aren't the same under the law because the current law states as such. Your metaphors are mind blowingly stupid.