Obama ~ The Issues (country, house, American, track, quote) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-29-2008, 12:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Freeskier
 
jibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople...
Posts: 1,544
Default

I'm going to say right now that this is likely to be an issue which no one will change their minds on. I suspect that WendyCal and Jayjamjah are of the thought that people's money are their own, under any and all circumstances, and that everyone should be responsible for their own wealth. If one man is buying his 6th house, and another is struggling to feed himself and his family just a few neighboorhoods away, the first man has no reason to part with his hard earned money.

I am of a completely different thought, I would honestly see no problem in paying higher taxes if I was very wealthy (and yes, 150K+ a year is very wealthy) if it meant it was being invested in GOOD social programs that were making a difference. Mainly, this comes from my not putting much value in monetary things. I've never understood the motive behind buying a 100K car. I've never understood the logic of owning 6 homes. I've never understood the motive behind buying designer clothing. I believe that his tax plan is fair, because I believe that if one very wealthy person has to pay so much taxes that he can no longer afford to buy that 4th or 5th or 6th home, if it gives enough of a tax break to another man so that he is able to keep his family from being evicted, I see no issue with it.

I'm sure this will open the floodgates to everything from calling me a socialist, to being naive, to whatever else. But it's one of those issues that is fueled solely by opinion, so of course everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I sincerely doubt I'll change anyone's, and I know that no one will change mine.
__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways


Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER
jibber is offline  
Old 10-29-2008, 12:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 271
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by jibber View Post
I'm going to say right now that this is likely to be an issue which no one will change their minds on. I suspect that WendyCal and Jayjamjah are of the thought that people's money are their own, under any and all circumstances, and that everyone should be responsible for their own wealth. If one man is buying his 6th house, and another is struggling to feed himself and his family just a few neighboorhoods away, the first man has no reason to part with his hard earned money.

I am of a completely different thought, I would honestly see no problem in paying higher taxes if I was very wealthy (and yes, 150K+ a year is very wealthy) if it meant it was being invested in GOOD social programs that were making a difference. Mainly, this comes from my not putting much value in monetary things. I've never understood the motive behind buying a 100K car. I've never understood the logic of owning 6 homes. I've never understood the motive behind buying designer clothing. I believe that his tax plan is fair, because I believe that if one very wealthy person has to pay so much taxes that he can no longer afford to buy that 4th or 5th or 6th home, if it gives enough of a tax break to another man so that he is able to keep his family from being evicted, I see no issue with it.

I'm sure this will open the floodgates to everything from calling me a socialist, to being naive, to whatever else. But it's one of those issues that is fueled solely by opinion, so of course everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I sincerely doubt I'll change anyone's, and I know that no one will change mine.
Who the heck do YOU know who owns 6 houses (that aren't travel trailers! ) and makes only makes $150K/year??? My bro and his wife make more than that, and they're paying on their house, they're saving for their children's college, they have money in the bank, a disposable income, but if they had to pay 50% in taxes??? That would change.

Our prices have been going up, up, and away, and we (Dev and me) only make about $27K, and with rent, a vehicle, insurances, taxes, and utilities, we have to pay bills before we can buy groceries! And we really don't have high bills.

The further and further his proposal dips down, the less and less motivation WE'RE going to have ~ who wants a raise that's going to COST YOU??? And the thing is, the further DOWN he goes, the even FURTHER down our Reps will take it.

You have a sort of bad habit of focusing in, too closely, on one particular thing or another, and it's easy to lose the Big Pic that way. (Just saying)
WendyCal is offline  
Old 10-29-2008, 12:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
Freeskier
 
jibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople...
Posts: 1,544
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WendyCal View Post
Who the heck do YOU know who owns 6 houses (that aren't travel trailers! ) and makes only makes $150K/year??? My bro and his wife make more than that, and they're paying on their house, they're saving for their children's college, they have money in the bank, a disposable income, but if they had to pay 50% in taxes??? That would change.

Our prices have been going up, up, and away, and we (Dev and me) only make about $27K, and with rent, a vehicle, insurances, taxes, and utilities, we have to pay bills before we can buy groceries! And we really don't have high bills.

The further and further his proposal dips down, the less and less motivation WE'RE going to have ~ who wants a raise that's going to COST YOU???

You have a sort of bad habit of focusing in, too closely, on one particular thing or another, and it's easy to lose the Big Pic that way. (Just saying)
Oh for christs sake. No where in my post did I say that someone who makes $150K a year had six houses. I called people who make $150K a year wealthy, and anyone who says otherwise has lost touch with reality. I used the 6 houses example because there are a lot of people in the US who are that wealthy, and like Big3 stated, they are not the ones paying the majority of the taxes. Furthermore, my post was mainly to highlight the difference of opinion that I suspect we have on the issue. I have no problem with taxing the very rich more than they currently are, for the reasons that Big3 stated earlier. People making around 30K a year are the ones bearing the brunt of taxes, and they are the ones that are needed to bolster the economy. Economies fail most spectacularly when the middle class is largely abolished, and in giving tax cuts to the very wealthy, it serves only to widen the gap between the very wealthy and the poor, and since the taxes will have to come from somewhere, the middle class will be left to pick up the slack.
__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways


Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER
jibber is offline  
Old 10-29-2008, 12:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jibber View Post
Oh for christs sake. No where in my post did I say that someone who makes $150K a year had six houses. I called people who make $150K a year wealthy, and anyone who says otherwise has lost touch with reality. I used the 6 houses example because there are a lot of people in the US who are that wealthy, and like Big3 stated, they are not the ones paying the majority of the taxes. Furthermore, my post was mainly to highlight the difference of opinion that I suspect we have on the issue. I have no problem with taxing the very rich more than they currently are, for the reasons that Big3 stated earlier. People making around 30K a year are the ones bearing the brunt of taxes, and they are the ones that are needed to bolster the economy. Economies fail most spectacularly when the middle class is largely abolished, and in giving tax cuts to the very wealthy, it serves only to widen the gap between the very wealthy and the poor, and since the taxes will have to come from somewhere, the middle class will be left to pick up the slack.
Jibber? Want to go look up the spread of wealth in America? And be prepared to be surprised.
WendyCal is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.