|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Who will it be? | |||
Obama | 42 | 79.25% | |
McCain | 5 | 9.43% | |
**** you RezZ, I'm not telling you! | 6 | 11.32% | |
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-30-2008, 05:44 AM | #262 (permalink) |
Occams Razor
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: End of the Earth
Posts: 2,472
|
Actually Perot was the front runner during the spring and early summer of 1992 and despite his temporary withdrawal from the race and his campaigns eventual collapse still finished with nearly 20% of the vote.
__________________
Me, Myself and I United as One If you're posting in the music forums make sure to be thoughtful and expressive, if you're posting in the lounge ask yourself "is this something that adds to the conversation?" It's important to remember that a lot of people use each thread. You're probably not as funny or clever as you think, I know I'm not. My Van Morrison Discography Thread |
08-30-2008, 07:24 AM | #263 (permalink) | |
Back to mono
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 509
|
Quote:
The whole "experience" thing is a smokescreen: How Good Are Experienced Presidents? All other things being equal, yes, I'd rather have the candidate with more experience...but I'm not going to vote for someone who's against me on almost every major policy simply because they're experienced. And re: the two party system; our system of voting is seriously flawed. The "one vote, one person" method all but guarentees that the two-party system will prosper. IRV voting, approval voting, and (preferably) range voting are all superior alternatives. None are perfect, but all encourage multiple parties and greater diversity. There is really no good defense for the two party system. It cannot represent all views, no matter how generalized. In the end, because of the primaries and the "winner takes all" plurality vote, we inevitably end up with two uninsipiring candidates.
__________________
"This sure doesn't look like 'Crazy Ernie's Amazing Emporium of Total Bargain Madness!'" |
|
08-30-2008, 01:39 PM | #265 (permalink) |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Is this the first time that a political party has used sex appeal (as a primary motive) to entice votes? I mean, I know Kennedy had a good bit of sex appeal but he was also an experienced politician who came from a very politically-oriented family. It's a good strategy. But a morally cogent one? No, methinks.
On a sidenote, she was the mayor of my best friend's hometown. He is a Libertarian and he says that he'll still vote for her. :?
__________________
first.am |
08-30-2008, 03:48 PM | #266 (permalink) |
isfckingdead
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
|
This is Why I Think Palin was such an excellent choice.
She lives in Alaska, which means she has more foreign policy experience then anyone. I mean she's right next to Canada, Russia and the North Pole. She supported right-wing demigod Pat Buchanan for president in 2000. She's a lifetime member of the NRA. She a fan of capital punishment. She's anti-gay marriage and even anti-gay couples to an extent, giving them no benefits whatsoever that a heterosexual couple would get. She thinks creationism should be taught in public schools. She'd announced plans to create a new sub-cabinet group of advisors to address the climate issues and reduce greenhouse gas emissions but after becoming McCain's running mate she stated humans aren't the cause of climate change. Her energy plan is "Big Oil First" hell yeah! She threatened to sue the government for listing polar bears as a threatened species. When asked about why she stated it would affect energy development (oil drilling) in Alaska. Oils>Polar bears. She once said she was the most pro-life Alaskan candidate ever, she's opposed to abortion even in cases of rape and incest. She was asked what she would do if her own daughter were raped and became pregnant, she responded that she would "choose life." |
08-30-2008, 04:39 PM | #267 (permalink) | |
Ad Astra
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 730
|
Quote:
Does this mean she can make Santa bring me my poney? But yeah, I agree Ethan. All those qualities would make a very good vice president. I was already voting for McCain, and now I'll probably stick with my decision. |
|
08-31-2008, 06:54 PM | #268 (permalink) | |
Existential Egoist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,468
|
Quote:
|
|
08-31-2008, 09:55 PM | #269 (permalink) |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Well, TBH he has some very conflicting convictions. He's a huge stoner, but his family raised him as ultra-conservative as possible. I suppose teenage rebellion led him to those choices, but he still couldn't pass up the nomination of his town's ex-mayor. I mean, c'mon, Wasilla had what, 5,000 residents? And apparently his family knew her very well.
__________________
first.am |
09-03-2008, 10:23 PM | #270 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 10
|
Did anyone see McCain's vp make that speech. I know I feel alot better knowing that the exploitive economic policies the US is going promote will be brought to us by a good ol American hockey mom.
Watching those mindless idiots flail about cheering on their team like they were watching a basket ball game was totally disgusting. I think alien vs predator’s main slogan "who ever wins, we all lose" seems to be very fitting. |
|