Indecision 2008 -what do you think????? (alternative, quote)

sleepy jack · 08-29-2008, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProggyMan

Wtf, I think it's obvious I mean a party that actually matters, not one that might get get 1% of the popular vote if they get really, really lucky.

Ross Perot did pretty well for himself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace

Quit nitpicking. It's quite obvious many of our politicians are corrupt. Just look at the Bush regime. The system may at times influence and tempt people to act in a way they shouldn't, but it is an individual's responsibility to stand up and uphold what is right. If they fall into corruption, it's their own fault.

I'm not saying politicians are corrupt I'm saying ProggyMan's reasoning and where he lays the blame is ridiculous and idiotic.

ProggyMan · 08-29-2008, 09:42 PM

I think corruption would have less of an on our government if there were more than two viable parties because it would be harder for lobbyists to push their agendas.

ProggyMan · 08-29-2008, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepy jack

Ross Perot did pretty well for himself.

Please, you and I both know that doesn't really matter.

Ace · 08-29-2008, 09:44 PM

Keep the argument friendly.
I haven't been following it, I'm just inserting my two cents.

sleepy jack · 08-29-2008, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProggyMan

Please, you and I both know that doesn't really matter.

If he didn't drop out of the race he had a big chance of becoming our president which I think is something that kind of matters.

ProggyMan · 08-29-2008, 09:50 PM

True, it matters, but in the grand scheme of things it was a small step and one that hasn't had much impact.

sleepy jack · 08-29-2008, 09:51 PM

You just said it didn't matter. Do you even know what you're talking about?

ProggyMan · 08-29-2008, 10:04 PM

I only have passing knowledge of Ross Perot, but I certainly know who he is, and it doesn't matter, in the sense that nothing has really come of it as of yet. No 3rd party is any more prevalent because of it.

NoseClams · 08-29-2008, 10:20 PM

the possibly next vice pres is a milf!!!

VICE PRESIDENT MILF - What Would Tyler Durden Do

Expletive Deleted · 08-29-2008, 10:32 PM

lol, Ross Perot had about as much a chance of becoming our president as Ron Paul did.

View Poll Results: Who will it be?
Obama	42	79.25%
McCain	5	9.43%
**** you RezZ, I'm not telling you!	6	11.32%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

08-29-2008, 10:20 PM	#259 (permalink)
NoseClams Ghost man on First! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Indiana Posts: 130	the possibly next vice pres is a milf!!! VICE PRESIDENT MILF - What Would Tyler Durden Do __________________ "Alcohol, the cause and solution to all of life's problems" - Homer Simpson http://www.last.fm/user/NoseClams/

08-29-2008, 09:42 PM	#252 (permalink)
ProggyMan Reformed Jackass Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3,964	I think corruption would have less of an on our government if there were more than two viable parties because it would be harder for lobbyists to push their agendas.

08-29-2008, 09:50 PM	#256 (permalink)
ProggyMan Reformed Jackass Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3,964	True, it matters, but in the grand scheme of things it was a small step and one that hasn't had much impact.

08-29-2008, 10:04 PM	#258 (permalink)
ProggyMan Reformed Jackass Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3,964	I only have passing knowledge of Ross Perot, but I certainly know who he is, and it doesn't matter, in the sense that nothing has really come of it as of yet. No 3rd party is any more prevalent because of it.

08-29-2008, 10:32 PM	#260 (permalink)
Expletive Deleted Dancing Machine Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: New York, NY Posts: 1,108	lol, Ross Perot had about as much a chance of becoming our president as Ron Paul did.