|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-04-2017, 05:54 AM | #7861 (permalink) |
Call me Mustard
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pepperland
Posts: 2,642
|
Well, maybe in a perfect world they'll come in and nail both Clinton (Bill and Hilary) and Trump for destroying American democracy.
But somehow I suspect Americans will continue to be comfortable in their apathy. PS- How can you say you supported anyone if you didn't vote? I supported and voted for Sanders in the primary (I admittedly held my nose when I voted for Hilary in the general- I like the Green Party, but Jill Stein was just a little too weird) |
11-04-2017, 06:02 AM | #7862 (permalink) | |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
|
Quote:
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
|
11-04-2017, 08:00 AM | #7864 (permalink) | |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Quote:
__________________
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html |
|
11-04-2017, 08:00 AM | #7865 (permalink) |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Because I’m a hick.
__________________
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html |
11-04-2017, 12:30 PM | #7867 (permalink) | |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Quote:
Clinton beat Trump by 4,270,000 votes in Cali so I figured she'd be OK without me. And I supported her leading up to the election by pointing out all of the ways she was less evil than Trump. Probably didn't flip anyone but at least gave em food for thought. Re: Sanders - Clinton beat him by a whole 12% of the votes (3,682,000). And that's just with the Dems voting. Pretty much a landslide. By comparison, Trump lost to Clinton in the popular vote by 2.1% (2,868,691) and that's with both parties voting. Hey, why don't they use the electoral college in the primaries? (might be a dumb question - it just popped into my head)
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
|
11-04-2017, 01:19 PM | #7868 (permalink) | |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Southern? Check
Racist? Check Alcoholic? Check Diabetic? Check Unemployed? Check In debt? Check I guess. I’m some sort of southern white trash. Quote:
__________________
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html |
|
11-04-2017, 01:23 PM | #7869 (permalink) |
Call me Mustard
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pepperland
Posts: 2,642
|
That's true. Historically, they didn't even have primaries. The party bosses decided who would be their candidate. It might have done us some good last year because, though I'm sure Hilary would have gotten the Democratic nod anyway, the Republicans would certainly have chosen someone other than Trump, possibly Rubio who seemed to have started out as the heir apparent.
|
|