Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   The Wow I Can't Believe That News Story Thread (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/30710-wow-i-cant-believe-news-story-thread.html)

Chula Vista 02-16-2018 03:46 PM

Mueller's special counsel indicts 13 Russians for tampering in the 2016 US election.

From the indictment:

Quote:

"Defendant ORGANIZATION had a strategic goal to sow discord in the U.S. political system, including the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Defendants posted derogatory information about a number of candidates, and by early to mid-2016, Defendants' operations included supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump ("Trump Campaign") and disparaging Hillary Clinton. Defendants made various expenditures to carry out those activities, including buying political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities. Defendants also staged political rallies inside the United States, and while posing as U.S. grassroots entities and U.S. persons, and without revealing their Russian identities and ORGANIZATION affiliation, solicited and compensated real U.S. persons to promote or disparage candidates. Some Defendants, posing as U.S. persons and without revealing their Russian association, communicated with unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign and with other political activists to seek to coordinate political activities."
Gonna be more plea deals worked out in the next couple of months.

Michael Flynn: deal made
Richard Pinedo: deal made
George Papadopoulos: deal made
Rick Gates: deal in the works
Paul Manafort: about to be charged with contempt. Plea deal to follow.
Jared Kushner: TBD
Donald Trump Jr.: TBD

Trollheart 02-16-2018 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1926993)
Mueller's special counsel indicts 13 Russians for tampering in the 2016 US election.

From the indictment:

And in reality, what's likely to happen? I'm not being facetious; I actually want to know if this means anything or if it's another non-event that Trump and his acolytes will sweep under the carpet of the White House?

Frownland 02-16-2018 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1926995)
And in reality, what's likely to happen? I'm not being facetious; I actually want to know if this means anything or if it's another non-event that Trump and his acolytes will sweep under the carpet of the White House?

World War III between the US and Russia.

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 04:03 PM

Special Counsel Robert Mueller is great at doing a bunch of worthless bull**** that adds up to nothing.

If this were a murder investigation it would go like this:

They found the victim shot
They identified the gun
The identified the owner of the gun
They found gunshot residue of the suspects hands
The suspect was found urinating on the grave of the victim
The suspect posts video footage of the victim dying on Facebook
Investigator interviews suspects mother
Investigator arrests someone who met the suspect three years ago
Media celebrates

Frownland 02-16-2018 04:04 PM

What did you expect to come of it?

Chula Vista 02-16-2018 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1926995)
And in reality, what's likely to happen? I'm not being facetious; I actually want to know if this means anything or if it's another non-event that Trump and his acolytes will sweep under the carpet of the White House?

Russia will, of course, not extradite any of the 13 who are citizens. I think this is simply a strong signal being sent to the folks involved on our end by the special counsel.

Note the wording of part of the idictment: "Some Defendants, posing as U.S. persons and without revealing their Russian association, communicated with unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign."

Unwitting is a clear signal to folks like Kushner, Manafort, and Jr., that Mueller knows a ton, but is giving them some breathing room for now so they'll opt for a plea deal.

He's giving them some rope. Pretty sure none of them will be willing to hang themselves on "The Donald's" behalf.

Frownland 02-16-2018 04:08 PM

My guess is that Trump was the (or one of) unwitting one(s) given that he really isn't that smart.

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1926999)
What did you expect to come of it?

I expected Trump to be arrested when he admitted he broke the law by obstructing justice when he confessed on national TV that’s exactly why he fired Comey. That’s the ****ing starting point. You arrest the confessed criminal and go from there. You don’t spend months and months investigating **** that’s less serious than what the mother****er already confessed to.

Frownland 02-16-2018 04:13 PM

There's actually a reason for that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_doubt

Have you ever heard of Al Capone?

Chula Vista 02-16-2018 04:21 PM

When trying to take down a sitting US President you better go slow and be 1000% sure what you have is going to be bulletproof.

Watergate break-in happened on June 17, 1972.

Nixon stepped down on August 9, 1974.

That's 26 months.

Mueller's investigation is only 9 months old.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/7da1...itemid=5543991

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1927002)
My guess is that Trump was the (or one of) unwitting one(s) given that he really isn't that smart.

Ya think?

Reasonable doubt?

Quote:

It was the first time that Trump had explicitly tied the Russia probe to his rationale for firing Comey. It was one of a series of explanations for dismissing the FBI director, some of which directly contradict those offered earlier by top White House officials.

Trump told NBC's Lester Holt: "And in fact when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said 'you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story, it's an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should have won'."
That’s obstruction of justice and against the law. When a Man breaks law and admits it he gets arrested unless the investigator is a pussy.

Trollheart 02-16-2018 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927004)
I expected Trump to be arrested when he admitted he broke the law by obstructing justice when he confessed on national TV that’s exactly why he fired Comey. That’s the ****ing starting point. You arrest the confessed criminal and go from there. You don’t spend months and months investigating **** that’s less serious than what the mother****er already confessed to.

For a cynic you're surprisingly naive if you thought there was ever any hope of this happening. Even I, with my one piece of knowledge about US politics (there are two parties, right?) did not expect that to ever come to pass. Nor will it.

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1927008)
When trying to take down a sitting US President you better go slow and be 1000% sure what you have is going to be bulletproof.

Watergate break-in happened on June 17, 1972.

Nixon stepped down on August 9, 1974.

That's 26 months.

Mueller's investigation is only 9 months old.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/7da1...itemid=5543991

There’s no point taking him down unless you remove him from office before his ****ing term ends.

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1927010)
For a cynic you're surprisingly naive if you thought there was ever any hope of this happening. Even I, with my one piece of knowledge about US politics (there are two parties, right?) did not expect that to ever come to pass. Nor will it.

Dude

It’s not that I don’t know that. I’m pointing out that Mueller is part of the problem not the solution.

Mueller needs to hang right next to Trump. Tie Comey’s bitch ass up there, too.

Frownland 02-16-2018 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927009)
Ya think?

Reasonable doubt?

Absolutely. Comey had clearly politicized the FBI with his memos and Trump said that that was the key driver in his reasoning. Boom. Reasonable doubt.

Quote:

That’s obstruction of justice and against the law. When a Man breaks law and admits it he gets arrested unless the investigator is a pussy.
Ditching due process is infinitely more fascist than anything Trump has even considered.

Chula Vista 02-16-2018 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927011)
There’s no point taking him down unless you remove him from office before his ****ing term ends.

His first term doesn't end for another 34 months......

https://media.giphy.com/media/3ohzdE...NTe8/giphy.gif

Mueller is being very methodical and ratcheting up the heat a little bit at a time. Today's indictment took things from a simmer to a mild boil.

Frownland 02-16-2018 04:39 PM

Can I get a copy of Mueller's diary?

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1927014)
Absolutely. Comey had clearly politicized the FBI with his memos and Trump said that that was the key driver in his reasoning. Boom. Reasonable doubt.



Ditching due process is infinitely more fascist than anything Trump has even considered.

Reasonable doubt and due process are for the TRIAL. The ****er hasn’t even been arrested.

Frownland 02-16-2018 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927020)
Reasonable doubt and due process are for the TRIAL. The ****er hasn’t even been arrested.

Due process absolutely involves the arrest but you're right, I concede.

Maajo 02-16-2018 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1927014)
Absolutely. Comey had clearly politicized the FBI with his memos and Trump said that that was the key driver in his reasoning. Boom. Reasonable doubt.



Ditching due process is infinitely more fascist than anything Trump has even considered.

Definitely not more fascist, but in the same ballpark for sure. As much as I don't like Trump, I'd rather that they could prove without a shadow of a doubt that he was actively working against the FBI in a direct way, or working with Russia to get himself elected. I don't expect to see Trump go down at this rate, not unless there's a bombshell that hasn't been uncovered yet (which is a real possibility, but not probable), but I think his credibility is being destroyed with Republican voters, and I do think that new standards will be enforced.

I don't think he'll run for a second term because he knows he'd get destroyed by a competent opponent, and I don't think his ego could handle a defeat like that.

Psy-Fi 02-16-2018 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Man like Monkey (Post 1926887)
Can't buy a chocolate Kinder Egg either. I think it is unsafe?

Meanwhile:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=de_gJqkbPt4


Chula Vista 02-16-2018 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maajo (Post 1927024)
I don't think he'll run for a second term because he knows he'd get destroyed by a competent opponent, and I don't think his ego could handle a defeat like that.

Plus, he'll be totally fed up with the job and all of its scrutiny by 2020. I'd wager he already is.

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1927023)
Due process absolutely involves the arrest but you're right, I concede.

It’s a term I always associated with a trial but you’re right

But goddamn I don’t see how there isn’t enough for an arrest

I think the failure to arrest him is indication of corruption and cowardice

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Psy-Fi (Post 1927026)

Goddamn milf alert!

Chula Vista 02-16-2018 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927028)
It’s a term I always associated with a trial but you’re right

But goddamn I don’t see how there isn’t enough for an arrest

I think the failure to arrest him is indication of corruption and cowardice

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1927008)
When trying to take down a sitting PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA, you better go slow and be 1000% sure what you have is going to be bulletproof.

Question, who has easier access to the absolute best top shelf defense lawyers in the US (and for free) than the POTUS?

Frownland 02-16-2018 05:25 PM

Lobbyists.

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1927031)
Question, who has easier access to the absolute best top shelf defense lawyers in the US (and for free) than the POTUS?

I don’t know, honestly.

I do know that Mueller has the authority to arrest Trump. But not the balls.

Trollheart 02-16-2018 06:09 PM

This would be Trump if Mueller tried...

Maajo 02-16-2018 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927036)
I don’t know, honestly.

I do know that Mueller has the authority to arrest Trump. But not the balls.

It would be a unilateral move for Mueller and the FBI to arrest a sitting president. Even with a president as incompetent as Trump, he's still seen as the de facto leader of the nation. The FBI definitely doesn't want to be responsible for any unrest resulting from removing the president from office. Remember, Nixon was never arrested even when it was clear that he had commited obstruction, but he lost support from the GOP and ended up being forced to resign. I think a similar fate awaits Trump.

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 06:57 PM

If he can’t be arrested he’s a de facto dictator.

MicShazam 02-16-2018 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927051)
If he can’t be arrested he’s a de facto dictator.

Basically, yeah.

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 07:18 PM

Did y’all see the repulsive crater cleavage frankentitties on that McDougal bitch?

I get better pussy than that and his Steven Tyler lookalike first c*nt

Maajo 02-16-2018 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927051)
If he can’t be arrested he’s a de facto dictator.

Not if there isn't a protocol to replace him and keep peace. If the FBI seizes leadership is that not a dictatorial move? Like I said, the FBI doesn't want to be responsible for what happens if millions of people start fighting in the streets. They might have no choice, but there has to be a higher standard than that.

Maajo 02-16-2018 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicShazam (Post 1927053)
Basically, yeah.

If he's a dictator then he won't be honoring the law and then that's a whole different ballgame.

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 07:39 PM

He broke the law when he fired Comey.

Maajo 02-16-2018 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927068)
He broke the law when he fired Comey.

The president is allowed to order our army to go into another country and kill people, but firing a guy in an attempt to cover his own ass should result in arrest? Are you ****ing kidding?

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maajo (Post 1927071)
The president is allowed to order our army to go into another country and kill people, but firing a guy in an attempt to cover his own ass should result in arrest? Are you ****ing kidding?

No.

If he’s allowed to fire anyone who gets on his ass we have no checks and balances.

And about our flippant invasions, every president in my lifetime is (or was) a war criminal and every living president should be tried and put to death.

Maajo 02-16-2018 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927074)
No.

If he’s allowed to fire anyone who gets on his ass we have no checks and balances.

If the FBI gets to arrest whoever they want, including the president, who checks them? Also, I'm pretty damn sure the president has the ability to fire Comey, otherwise it wouldn't have happened. There's probably just some deniability Trump has that you're overlooking and Mueller isn't.

Quote:

And about our flippant invasions, every president in my lifetime is (or was) a war criminal and every living president should be tried and put to death.
I'd concede your point in regards to George W. Bush's Administration, minus the death penalty stuff. You and I were never in a position like the one Obama or Clinton was in where they had to ask themselves whether it was best to remove support and potentially let an organization like ISIL take hold.

OccultHawk 02-16-2018 09:46 PM

Quote:

If the FBI gets to arrest whoever they want, including the president, who checks them?
They answer to the president but that doesn’t mean the president is above the law. If the FBI went rogue other law enforcement would be duty bound to issue arrests where the law is broken. They’re beholden to abuse of powers laws like all law enforcement agencies. The judicial branch handles the cases after the arrests. In order for the system to work certain good faith common sense measures have to be honored. Ridiculous ideas like the president can impede any investigation he doesn’t like or can pardon himself and so on cannot be accepted as normal policy. Clearly, Trump has gone rogue and has openly and flagrantly broken the law. So far, he’s getting a pass. If Americans accept this state of affairs or are placated by Mueller’s pathetic response then we go deeper and deeper into this dictatorship.

Chula Vista 02-16-2018 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 1927083)
If Americans accept this state of affairs or are placated by Mueller’s pathetic response then we go deeper and deeper into this dictatorship.

What pathetic response? He's building an iron clad case brick by brick. Indicting
the 13 Russians this morning was a massive big balls move.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:43 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.