|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-24-2014, 11:36 PM | #2023 (permalink) |
Mord
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 4,873
|
I understand that. I'm wondering what precisely that evidence is. Eyewitness accounts? Forensic evidence? What brought them to their decision? Is the grand jury corrupt, or is there clear-cut evidence of no misconduct?
|
11-24-2014, 11:39 PM | #2025 (permalink) | |
All day jazz and biscuits
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,354
|
Quote:
My whole point is that there is an unstable amount of racial tension right now and for them to make this decision, announce it at 8:00 at night, when they KNEW what the reaction would be...is just wrong. Drag it out. Let the tension subside before you make your case or more people are going to die. |
|
11-24-2014, 11:43 PM | #2026 (permalink) | |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
|
Quote:
|
|
11-24-2014, 11:44 PM | #2027 (permalink) | |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
|
Quote:
|
|
11-24-2014, 11:44 PM | #2028 (permalink) | |
Dragon
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kansas, United States
Posts: 2,744
|
Quote:
|
|
11-24-2014, 11:48 PM | #2030 (permalink) |
Mord
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 4,873
|
We'll have to wait until the evidence the grand jury saw is made public before we can start saying that justice hasn't been served. If the evidence is such that the officer should have been indicted, then there is a reason for rebellion against the government. If the evidence, however, exonerates the officer, then there's no support for any protests. Either way, there should be reaction from the public until the public knows the evidence.
|
|