The Official Iraq War thread (country, American, bling, member)

[Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01]

We invaded to remove Saddam from power. We can't have anyone threatening our power. And I have no problem with this logic, except for the fact that the US was being scared ****tless when Korea started doing nuclear tests; we should have attacked them right then and there, but that would ruin our little "Home of the Free" illusion.

Are you ****ing serious?

YEs I'm ****ing serious.

Call me evil, stupid, not in touch with reality. THIS is what I believe.

[Alexander the Grape]

Obviously not, but people still say "lol it wuz part of the war on terrer!!!11!"

Its just another excuse like the whole "humanitarian intervention" bull****.

That was in response to MHDTV, I posted that before Voice of the Soul posted.

I honestly don't see how Saddam was a threat to our power.

Invading North Korea would have been stupid. If they had nuclear weapons they would have used them as soon as we invaded, and then the world would have ended.

[MHDTV]

Originally Posted by Alexander the Grape

Obviously not, but people still say "lol it wuz part of the war on terrer!!!11!"

Its just another excuse like the whole "humanitarian intervention" bull****.

That was in response to MHDTV, I posted that before Voice of the Soul posted.

I honestly don't see how Saddam was a threat to our power.

Invading North Korea would have been stupid. If they had nuclear weapons they would have used them as soon as we invaded, and then the world would have ended.

No they wouldn't, because of the very reason you stated.

Originally Posted by Voice_of_the_Soul12,13,01

We invaded to remove Saddam from power. We can't have anyone threatening our power. And I have no problem with this logic, except for the fact that the US was being scared ****tless when Korea started doing nuclear tests; we should have attacked them right then and there, but that would ruin our little "Home of the Free" illusion.


YEs I'm ****ing serious.

Call me evil, stupid, not in touch with reality. THIS is what I believe.

You aren't in touch with reality, you are stupid, and I honestly believe, that what you are saying is what you believe.

Saddam was not a threat to our power. Saddam was our trial run of our right to preemptive war.
It was an illegal, unjustifiable act of aggression.

Originally Posted by MHDTV

No they wouldn't, because of the very reason you stated.

1. You are 12, read some books, take a history course or two. Until then, don't try to spew your opinion into a thread you know nothing about. You were 8 when this war was declared.

2. So us invading North Korea wouldn't have led to a nuclear assault? Do you think that the moment we invade we are going to completly immobilize their nuclear missles? Are we going to kill Kim Jong Il in one fell swoop? How do you propose this is going to work?

I think that 12 year olds in decision-making positions in Bush's cabinet put us in this situation in the first place.

[MHDTV]

Assuming you aren't history major, I've probably read more books on the subject than you. I don't think North Korea's leaders aren't really stupid enough to start a nuclear war against what is essentially the U.N. Also, there are ways of disabling their supply of nuclear weapons.

Originally Posted by MHDTV

Assuming you aren't history major, I've probably read more books on the subject than you. I don't think North Korea's leaders aren't really stupid enough to start a nuclear war against what is essentially the U.N. Also, there are ways of disabling their supply of nuclear weapons.

I am loling at you.

[MHDTV]

I'd say North Korea loses to the U.N. in a nuclear war. You're crazy if you think otherwise.

Get your ass on Glenn Beck son.

[MHDTV]

I'm hardly a conservative.

I don't care. /: