|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-30-2007, 06:59 PM | #51 (permalink) | |
Imperfectly Perfect
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,290
|
Quote:
2) How does sending troops to Iraq have anything to do with the Environment? 3) Social Security > trees. (Politicians are just too scared to touch the issue, but my generation is currently ****ed concerning this issue) 4) War > trees (The trees can wait until we resolve the issue) 5)Poverty > trees (Should we take care of the trees before our own people) 6) When the **** did I say I liked Bush?
__________________
"it is only through a limitless accumulation of the imperfect that a certain type of perfection can be attained" |
|
05-30-2007, 07:04 PM | #52 (permalink) |
isfckingdead
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
|
You're still ignoring the fact Bush started an illegal war, made poverty worse and is trying to screw up social security. Oh and when all the trees are cut down and we don't have any oxygen run around preaching about how social security was more important. I repeat: TOOL!
|
05-30-2007, 07:11 PM | #53 (permalink) | |
I love Puck
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 4,614
|
Quote:
__________________
We are entirely smooth, We admit to the truth, We are the best at what we do.
|
|
05-30-2007, 07:31 PM | #54 (permalink) |
Un****withable
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 196
|
Hopefully our government can focus on more than one issue at a time. I know bureaucracy is bad, but its not that bad.
I do agree, though, that for the most part human issues>environmental issues. Of course environmental issues become human issues, but I believe we have more time to deal with global warming than we do to deal with the thousands of people being killed in Darfur. Those are just examples. Still, our government can easily deal with multiple problems at a time, so we shouldn't have to prioritize.
__________________
I'm back like JC lol. |
05-30-2007, 08:45 PM | #56 (permalink) | |
To The Bat Cave!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
|
|
05-31-2007, 12:56 AM | #58 (permalink) |
Un****withable
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 196
|
Well in 2000 Bush only won the election because the Supreme Court happened to have a Republican majority and decided to stop the recount in Florida. I don't see any point to stopping the recount, other than they wanted Bush to be president no matter how people voted. They couldn't just let the people decide and see how it played out. It was definately a ruling against democracy.
__________________
I'm back like JC lol. |
05-31-2007, 08:34 AM | #59 (permalink) | |
Imperfectly Perfect
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,290
|
Quote:
To save my self the hassle of explaining here's Wikipedia's rebuttal to your claim that trees don't have anything to do with global warming: "The rest (1/4) of the anthropogenic emissions (excess CO2) are predominantly due to land-use change, especially deforestation." And if you paid attention in 6th grade Science you learned about the Runaway Greenhouse effect and its relation with the excess of CO2, which I hope you understand and I don't need to explain it to you. And I just said trees because I didn't feel the need to state all the reasons of global warming, like car pollution, aerosol, slash and burn, ect. It seemed like common knowledge and irreverent to the point I was making.
__________________
"it is only through a limitless accumulation of the imperfect that a certain type of perfection can be attained" |
|
|