|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-12-2007, 12:12 PM | #31 (permalink) | |
To The Bat Cave!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
all the facts havent been made clear |
|
06-13-2007, 12:08 AM | #32 (permalink) | ||
Bright F*cking Red
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,222
|
Quote:
__________________
How'd I end up here to begin with? I don't know. Why do I start what I can't finish? Oh please, don't barrage me with questions to all those ugly answers. My ego's like my stomach- it keeps shitting what I feed it. But maybe I don't want to finish anything anymore.. maybe I can wait in bed 'til she comes home. and whispers.... Quote:
|
||
06-13-2007, 06:05 AM | #34 (permalink) |
My home? Discabled,
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 204
|
You do realise that global warming is damaging access to drinking water by melting the snow and glaciers on mountain tops, causing flooding which mixes drinking water with sewage making it undrinkable?
It r all linked.
__________________
Vita brevis, Occasio praeceps |
06-13-2007, 08:48 AM | #35 (permalink) | |
They call me Tundra Boy
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In your linen cupboard.
Posts: 1,166
|
Quote:
Improved access to clean drinking water is primarily a local issue, for governments to sort out for their own citizens. Purifying a water supply only really affects the people who use that water supply, and those who interact with them. As a political argument, I don't think that "we aren't going to cut down on greenhouse gas emissions because people here don't have clean drinking water" holds that much weight, certainly not internationally where the politicians of the other nations don't really care about whether or not your citizens have access to drinking water... they're not voted in to give a toss about that I'm afraid. In Bangalore, for example, if the money that comes in through call-centres, computing and biotech was pumped into making clean drinking water available - rather than whatever the hell else they've been spending it on (big buildings, clubs and clothes I think) - then that drinking water issue wouldn't be so much of a problem. |
|
06-13-2007, 05:39 PM | #37 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: milton keynes
Posts: 7
|
If we stopped all C02 emissions tomorrow it would make no difference. The amount of tree's we chop down every day will keep the C02 levels rising anyway cos there will be nothing to soak it up!
__________________
BigFunWithBrian.Com
'For people who like fun' |
06-14-2007, 08:00 AM | #40 (permalink) |
Imperfectly Perfect
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,290
|
nikhil.
Do you really think the countless number of extremely educated scientists who spend their lives studying global warming have no clue what is going on? Do you really believe that what you said is true? Because, while some of it is fact based, you take leaps which shouldn't be taken. You're not the only "intelligent" person in the world. And the fact that you think everybody on the site is media educated, means that you really aren't as intelligent as you believe. We would not be spending billions of dollars researching a non-existent problem, one of the scientists would of caught on to the non-existent idea if it was true.
__________________
"it is only through a limitless accumulation of the imperfect that a certain type of perfection can be attained" |
|