|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-23-2020, 08:00 AM | #21 (permalink) | ||
the bantering battleaxe
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Cute Post Malone's mom
Posts: 3,394
|
Define a lot. Some musicians have a more experimental (or rather, interpretative) approach than others for sure, but I'd say conventionally the differences aren't great. I don't know enough about classical music to give a very detailed answer though
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Marie Monday; 12-23-2020 at 04:05 PM. |
||
12-23-2020, 08:07 AM | #22 (permalink) | ||
the bantering battleaxe
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Cute Post Malone's mom
Posts: 3,394
|
Also actually, I think the analogy with spoken language applies here too: I think the differences between classical music performances are comparable to different actors playing the same role in a play, although plays leave a bit more room for variation maybe
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-23-2020, 10:14 AM | #23 (permalink) | |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Quote:
A play might even leave less room for interpretation depending on factors like the personality of the theatre director and how much instruction the composer included with their scores and so on. Plus, that ability to find that really perfect tone which is universally crucial throughout all genres of music from garage rock guitar hooks to free jazz saxophone to classical even to computer generated drone ... it’s completely make or break and there’s no faking it.
__________________
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html |
|
12-23-2020, 03:53 PM | #24 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 1,802
|
All of that is spot on. To me it's all about the group's sound. Of course, they need to be good musicians in their own right but a group of talented people don't always add up to a crack ensemble. That magic is rare. And it doesn't always communicate despite what the players may be feeling (as anyone who's ever played in a band could tell you!).
I like the early Juilliard Quartet's version because they were in a period where Happy Birthday would have sounded fabulous. They just had that indefinable fire and cohesion missing from most versions of the quartets that I've heard. I'm listening again to the Danish Quartet's version of Op. 131 (in the first post) and, for me, while there are moments of brilliance (particularly in the up-tempo movements; the scherzo, in particular) they lack the power of the unity of voices in the Juilliard version. They play beautifully but, to me, the Juilliard group were on another level. But, as they say, to each his own. |
12-23-2020, 04:35 PM | #25 (permalink) | |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Quote:
And you know they practice together all the time and know how to communicate verbally. But I don’t think it’s just that. Like I’m saying above there’s something borderline telepathic about it. Much much easier for me to spot in jazz though.
__________________
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html |
|
01-03-2021, 02:30 AM | #26 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 1,802
|
Thought I’d move to a more bite-sized quartet and picked No 11 Opus 95 in F Minor, “serioso”. Man, do I pick em. Opus 95 backstory.
And, well yeah, the Alban Berg Quartet again. |
01-03-2021, 02:55 AM | #27 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 1,802
|
Dave Hurwitz calls The Alban Berg the Viennese clone of the Juilliard Quartet. His videos are fun to watch (if you’re really interested in classical works). Here’s a run-down of his favorite Beethoven String Quartet cycles on CD:
|
|