|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-17-2013, 04:18 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 10
|
Wolfgang Mozart Analysis
Hey guys!
My name's Joey.. I'm new to the forums. I'm an aspiring young, freshman Musician at a University in the East. I've always admired music, but had no background in studies before attending this college. This post is in regards to an assignment I was given in my very first music class. I was directed to formally break down Mozart's symphony no. 40. All aspects of the assignment have been completed, except one. I am looking for help in determining SPECIFIC timings of the song, creating a simple formal diagram. So far I, understand that it is sonata form, so I know that it will break down like this: 1) Primary Theme 2) Bridge 3) Secondary Theme 4) Development 5) Primary Theme Repeated 6) Bridge #2 7) Secondary Theme Repeated 8) Coda HOWEVER- I can not determine exactly when the primary theme turns into a bridge, or when the second theme turns into the development, etc. My question to you- can someone provide me with specific timings of when the formal diagram changes, so i can have a better understanding of what it truly means for the theme to change, and also so i will have a better understanding of ideas such as bridges? (Example- primary theme.. 0:00 - x:xx.... bridge #1.. x:xx- z:zz.. etc.) Any help would be appreciated. Thank you, Joe Ps. here's the link for the piece- Mozart, Symphony No. 40 in G minor, first movement - YouTube |
04-17-2013, 06:45 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 10
|
I do not have a score, however I actually am now aware of the specific timings in the piece (not sure if it's 100% accurate).
If you could help me dissect it by exact times in the youtube link attached it would mean the world, as for I can not make heads or tails of the piece. 1st Theme (bars 1-28) Bridge Passage (bars 28-43) 2nd Subject (bars 44-100) Development (bars 101-164) Recapitulation 1st theme (164-184) Bridge Passage (184-227) 2nd Subject (227-260) Outro (261-299) |
05-28-2013, 02:00 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: May 2013
Location: New York City
Posts: 4
|
When you enjoy something enough, the analysis can bring a deeper enjoyment. It's the difference between knowing that you enjoy something, and knowing why you enjoy it. I'm a musician myself, and this kind of study can reveal profound observations - of course only if you study truly great works such as a symphony by Mozart - in lesser composers there might not be so much to discover, no matter how hard you try.
|
05-29-2013, 08:03 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Someplace Awful
Posts: 123
|
Quote:
I don't have time at the moment to help directly, but can offer advice. In that time period, the "rules" were more clearly laid out. Before determining actual parts/themes, find ALL of the cadences. Themes and parts typically end with a stronger cadence than variations do (say, a perfew authentic or imperfect authentic at the end of a part and maybe a half or plagal between variations within a part). Another thing to look for are key changes, which usually aren't written out-right (say a double bar line then the new time signature), but are usually done via modulation (chords like V7/iii → "iii" [of the new key]). Then look at the actual progressions between cadences, ignoring ornamental things like non-chord tones, and see if any of them have the same pattern (say movement up by fourth, down by third, up by second, down by fifth). Last edited by anathematized_one; 05-29-2013 at 08:21 PM. |
|
08-22-2013, 04:58 AM | #10 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
Reminds me of something Miss Manners said in one of her books. (!) She said I don't know of any difference between thinking you are happy, and being happy. |
|
|