|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-30-2007, 09:29 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The tundra of the north.
Posts: 16
|
Canon is a pretty impressive and extremely elegant piece of music, but I'm not entirely sure if I'd place it as the most beautiful ever composed. Of course it's a classic in every single meaning of the word, but there are a good many lilting pieces out there by a good number of composers that can match the atmosphere. Although I'm not entirely sure if any get the overall effect as Canon due to how easily it's recognized.
__________________
|
09-06-2007, 02:04 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The South
Posts: 13
|
Canon in D is indeed most excellent...but....
I'm a composer/ ex-concertist myself and I've always enjoyed Canon in D which has a melody that really sinks down deep and you find it playing in your head when you go to bed and wake up in the morning.
Yet, for that period, I find the music of Vivaldi, the greatest violin virtuoso of his day (only Paganini bested him as a violin master) especially the four part Four Seasons to be perhaps the most enjoyable Baroque period piece of all time. The four parts are all excellent and the little dance included in partIII is definitely cool as hell. But then everybody is different and the pieces that are my favorites like Chopin's Prelude in F# minor, Etude in E major, Liszt's Totentanz, Bach's Tocata and Fugue in D minor (Leopold Stokowsky's arrangement for orchestra as heard on the original Fantasia by Disney) and the A minor fugue from Mozart's Fantasy and Fugue in C Major which is perhaps the most complex three voci fugue in existence and a gem to play. Mozart could do counterpoint when in the mood. His variations on the "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star" them as it is known today are the non plus ultra of variations until Beethoven came along and won the 1st prize for variation genius. And of course Beethoven's 9th symphony and the Emperor Concerto of his are really great stuff. But here there is no right and wrong. In a Peanuts comic strip Lucy came to Shroeder who was playing Beethoven on the piano and said "Hey, that Beethoven wasn't so great" and Shroeder said "Not so great, what do you mean?" and Lucy said "What about Bach, Brahms, Chopin, Liszt, Berlioz, Rachmaninoff...." and mentioned about 50 names of composers. Without a missed beat Shroeder looked up and said "They were great too!" And that about says it all. Their names will last as long as humanity exists which is more than you can say for the gimmicy and overpromoted pop music which can net you millions of dollars but be totally forgotten ten years later. The Great Composer's music is like a precious Diamond that'll last the test of time. Most of pop music is like shiny zirconias or crystal glass. It is shiny and pretty but does not have anything of lasting value and soon will be, if not totally forgotten, shelved somewhere in some library archives listened to by nobody. Why people get so caught up with the lives of these modern ersatz musicians and practically kill themselves to go to a concert and wait all those hours in line to hear somebody that nobody will give a damn about five years later is beyond me. Still here and there, even in pop music are some gems and some artists whose names will also last probably as long as humanity exists. Among the piles of garbage some shiny nuggets of gold can be found for those who take the time to search. |
09-06-2007, 03:06 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 100
|
Sorry to burst your bubble, but classical music is not inherently better than any other genre just due to the fact that its musicians are remembered today. You can't intelligently say for sure that almost every modern artist will be tossed aside in a matter of years.
|
11-01-2007, 03:14 AM | #15 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
|
|
11-01-2007, 10:54 AM | #16 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Actually it depends largely on social factors. Classical guitarists, who should only be second to Pianists in their ability to recreate compositions accurately are rarely remembers. I'm reading a book called "Practicing: A Musicians return to music" and he discusses how Fernando Sor and Marko Giulianni (spelled wrong I'm sure) were greats, and that the later sat at the head of Viennas Musical Society in 1808 with Beethoven and who among us has heard his music?
It depends on the music as well. Rock bands are still imitating and beholden to a movement that took place 40 years ago. Rap forgot who was #1 yesterday.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
11-02-2007, 12:47 AM | #18 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
|
|
11-29-2007, 10:36 AM | #20 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Memphis, Tenn and occasionally Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 44
|
Jean-Francois Paillard
The Canon is gorgeous, but its GOT to be Jean-Francois Paillard's recording (everyone else butchers it IMO). Look it up on Amazon...
There's a moment near the end that recurs about three times where there's like a suspended fourth against something else-- I'm not sure, but that one split second is exquisite & brings tears to my eyes... ~ josh
__________________
Last edited by fool on the hill; 11-29-2007 at 10:37 AM. Reason: typoooo fixxed |