Music Banter
Page 3 of 4 12 3 4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Classical (https://www.musicbanter.com/classical/)
-   -   Classical? (https://www.musicbanter.com/classical/17538-classical.html)

MoonlitSunshine 08-19-2006 04:50 PM
haha yeah. I saw his post, thought about slagging him, then saw yours and thought Nah, there's no way I can beat that...

tdoc210 08-19-2006 04:51 PM
i thought it was funny, the stupid smiley didnt work

kRaZ 10-16-2006 06:33 AM
Anything by Chopin. Favs have gotta be:

Nocturne in C# minor or Fantasie Improumtu. Can't go wrong.

Hayabusa_Led 10-19-2006 08:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonlitSunshine (Post 262488)
Try some Tchaikovsky. The Romeo and Juliet Fantasy Overture is amazing. Or Bach. Personally I'm not a fan of Beethoven or Mozart, I find their music too mechanical, whereas Bach's is very much alive; he uses interweaving melodies and counter melodies, which are astounding to listen to. Admittedly I don't know much classical music as in actual specific pieces and composers, but I was brought up around it, and recently I've found that I enjoy listening to those 2 in particular, but that's just me. you've got centuries of music to choose from; take your time, and dip into everything.
Bach was part of the era where music HAD to be mechanical it was forbidden to express feelings in music during the Baroque times. Mozart began the transition from that mechanical type of music to feeling and expression. So you've got it backwards

MoonlitSunshine 10-19-2006 11:24 AM
Listen to both, and tell me who sounds more emotional. Bach's has more life to it. It may be more structured, but mozarts is too musically perfect, it's dry a lot of the time.

Hayabusa_Led 10-19-2006 05:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonlitSunshine (Post 296437)
Listen to both, and tell me who sounds more emotional. Bach's has more life to it. It may be more structured, but mozarts is too musically perfect, it's dry a lot of the time.
I see your point now, I had misinterpreted it. However, I would dissagre with the later statment. While it maybe almost musically "perfect" his muisc still has tons of emotion and reflects of time during his life. All Bach's music was about the church and his passion for it.

MoonlitSunshine 10-20-2006 09:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayabusa_Led (Post 296545)
I see your point now, I had misinterpreted it. However, I would dissagre with the later statment. While it maybe almost musically "perfect" his muisc still has tons of emotion and reflects of time during his life. All Bach's music was about the church and his passion for it.
I'll admit i haven't heard very much of his work, But that I have heard has been lacking what I've been talking about. I just find Bach's work more lively, more stimulating.

Hayabusa_Led 10-22-2006 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonlitSunshine (Post 296631)
I'll admit i haven't heard very much of his work, But that I have heard has been lacking what I've been talking about. I just find Bach's work more lively, more stimulating.
I think its just a matter of preference so there is no right or wrong. :)

MoonlitSunshine 10-22-2006 03:14 PM
yeah, pretty much.

matthews_world 10-22-2006 11:14 PM
How about a rock rendition of Pachelbel's "Canon in D".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=215_Mei8IZg

The Korean guy playing the solo got discovered via through YouTube because of his playing skills.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/11092006/...itar-star.html


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:02 PM.
Page 3 of 4 12 3 4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.