|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Rate! | |||
Excellent |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 25.00% |
Very Good |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 75.00% |
Solid |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Average |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Poor |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Crap |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
...
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,776
|
![]() AMM - AMMMusic (1966) ![]() This album was recommended by Skaligojurah and he had some interesting things to say about it: Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
![]()
Listened to it just awhile ago to refresh my memory, and still a very good listen. It didn't give me the same effect as when I first listened to it. With the shrieking violin, and seemingly random drum solos, transistor radio spewing off random unrelated statements. It was like falling into a schizophrenic Hell.
On this listen, I got the same effect, but it was a bit more comfortable. I get the feeling this is one of those albums you NEED to listen to on good speakers/headphones cause I used to listen to it with either, or, and it's lost a bit of power. Still though, my biggest complaint on last listen was the fact it just felt too short. Not a bad complaint at all considering. If I were to give it a star rating it'd be a 4/5. Seeing as, I consider it an amazing feat of subconscious musicianship to be able to create something with such a thick, convincing, dramatic effect with no preparation at all whatsoever. Yet, I don't think it has the lasting value to be worth 4.5 or 5 out of 5.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: -_-_-_-_~__~-~_-`_`-~_-`-~-~
Posts: 1,276
|
![]()
Mm. Much better than the other good one I heard from these guys a while back (Newfoundland). When you don't pay too much attention to it, it operates almost like a drone record, which is a nice side effect.
However, obviously, the most intriguing thing about this style of music is to devote a lot of effort to it. When I actually began to pick apart the various instruments and the manipulations being thrust upon them, I started to enjoy it a lot more. Not like my enjoyment skyrocketed, but once you understand the sources of all of these sounds and how they morph so freely, you get more out of it. Taking a crash course on the history of the band through Wikipedia or something really doesn't hurt, and it'll help you appreciate (if not like) these sounds. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
![]()
This one was already in my collection as well. It sure as hell ain't easy listening. I think this is an important genre stretching record. It may be worth pointing out that this record predates Peter Brötzmann's Machine Gun by four years. I mentioned Keith Rowe on the experimental guitarists thread. Anyway, this is a brutal record. It gives the listener far less to hang on to than something like Ornette's Free Jazz. Now, on our last discussion I got in trouble for comparing Private/Public to Hole. I do think there is some, and hopefully more valid, reason to compare this record to The Magic City by Sun Ra. They both push the boundaries of free jazz and have a kind of random nature and they both came out in 1966. Without a doubt this was some of the hippest stuff of that time. AMMMusic is one of the great moments of 20th C music.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) |
Let it drip
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,397
|
![]()
Absolute classic in my eyes. I actually made a thread about this band a while back but, alas, it garnered no replies. Glad to see this, I discovered them during my explorations into the murkier depths of Krautrock (They're English, I know), in particular Limbus 4 (with whom Amm share a similiar musical approach I think), and was blown away upon my first listen of AMMMusic.. I suppose the reasons I love this album so much are the egoless and non-idiomatic manner with which the group plays quite standard instrumentation - and the ways they meld this with altogether stranger audio manipulations. To me it's free improvisation sounding its most threatening, if you can survive the album's duration you best be prepared with a dust pan and brush - because your brain will be all over the shop come the end.
Last edited by Sneer; 02-21-2011 at 08:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
![]()
I was actually massively disappointed with Sun Ra meets John Cage. It sounded too much like they were taking turns, and I felt Cage's contribution was kind of weak.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
...
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,776
|
![]()
Well, this is a tough one. Didn't really have as much time as I wanted to thoroughly dive into it, and that's necessary for this kind of challenging music. I've heard it three of four times and it's a very difficult listening. I've heard it on speakers and then on headphones and it's equally challenging either way. Clutnuckle said: "When you don't pay too much attention to it, it operates almost like a drone record". Hmmm...I didn't find this to be the case for me. When I don't pay a close attention, it becomes irritating, creating a discomfort, or simply inviting me to pay attention. It is intrusive, which drone isn't. I can loose myself in drone, drift away, but with this I am invited to make a considerable effort in connecting between 'random' sounds, to co-create basically. Otherwise it will not make much sense musically.
Perhaps 'inviting' isn't the right word, this music is 'demanding' and that's especially evident through the headphones. Every sound is banging you on the head and fighting for your attention. We can't pay attention to everything at once, it is in our nature to make selections and since the artists didn't do that (at least it doesn't seem like it after a couple of listens), that job is on you. The result is a mind-numbing and exhausting. Come on Ammmusic, give me some hints, meet me half way. But, that's the thing with pure free improvisation, the listener is just a coincidence, hell everything here is a coincidence, without beginning and the end, eternal or more likely non-existent. I shouldn't even be listening to it recorded, because that's interference with the basic concept of free improvisation, that it should be temporal and based on chance. This music existed only as unprepared sessions at some point in time, in 1966, and it's gone now. The fact that we're able to hear it recorded as many times as we want and to actually learn how to listen to it is cheating. Because that's when we are trying to make a sense out of these sounds, to connect them, to compose. Isn't this completely the opposite of what the musicians are doing? They wanted to create something ephemeral, visceral, that comes from chaotic subconsciousness, outside of reason, absurd and completely coincidental. The presence of a listener is welcomed, but not necessary. But here's a paradox, these sounds are not music until listener connects them, 'cause the musicians didn't connect them, at least not intentionally. Actually the best parts of this album are when the musicians are connected with each other unintentionally: the long middle parts of 'Later During A Flaming Riviera Sunset' and 'After Rapidly Circling The Plaza', two longest tracks. Maybe the extended duration gives them a chance to completely dive and loose themselves as individuals, thus connecting with each other and making the most sense, at the same time reaching to the listener. Isn't this also a paradox? That total immersion in subconscience actually sounds like composing the most, undermining free improvisation. It is after all our nature to make connections and relations between things, and that drive comes from the inside. That's why I always felt that it takes a lot of mental effort to make a total chance music, because it has to skip our inner drive for connecting, so therefore it is more based on reason, a cold experiment. When Ammmusic breaks into this territory it is at its most unappealing. So to get back to the start, like I said, I've heard this four times. I'm not really sure if another four times will change anything. This kind of music should be listened only once and live, if one really wants to totally experience the concept, because I suspect that a lot of unexpected and most important things happen between audience and musicians adding to the unpredictable nature of this experiment. I also realized that I have more enjoyment in thinking about the concept of total free improvisation and its possibilities than actually listening to it (thus this long post). For me, this album is impossible to rate. I understand its historical importance and influence, but going by the music alone (that shouldn't even be listened like this) there is a dilemma: Is it a representation of chaos or is it the chaos?
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|