|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Rate! | |||
Excellent | 1 | 14.29% | |
Very Good | 2 | 28.57% | |
Solid | 3 | 42.86% | |
Average | 0 | 0% | |
Poor | 0 | 0% | |
Crap | 1 | 14.29% | |
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-05-2011, 03:17 PM | #31 (permalink) | ||
...
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,776
|
Quote:
I'm not sure I understand the bold part. Where does the artist brag about something, through his work, or in an interview or generally in public life? I'll repeat this for the nth time, the only thing that should be critically evaluated is his work. Quote:
The term 'misleading' is also taken from human experience exactly like 'pretentious'. (I mean, how can the song mislead you, only artist can ). And the term doesn't say the whole thing, it can be a good or a bad quality to have in art. For example, some work can be simple and unassuming on the first glance, but going more into it, it revels layers of depth that you didn't think would be there. It's a very satisfying revelation that draws you to come back to it over and over. The other example, misleading can mean that some work is unpredictable or surprising in the way it develops its form, or composition and that can be ultimately satisfying artistically.The term 'inaccurate' doesn't tell me much at all, and is somewhat meaningless when discussing artistic merit. Art is not an exact science, so how can it be accurate and why would we expect it to be. In the end, your main problem seems to be that you can't separate the artist from his work and that is necessary when discussing the work's artistic merit.
__________________
|
||
02-07-2011, 08:09 PM | #32 (permalink) | |
air quote
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pollen & mold
Posts: 3,108
|
So, I have listened to Transform probably 10 times now, far more than I normally would have probably. Not because it's bad, I think it's a good album. I was only afraid of it for about a minute because it gets really interesting around then. The reason I got scared when all I heard was a tone is that it reminded me of when I tried to get into the early experimental electronic composers and pretty much failed. To be honest I can't get through the OHM: The Early Gurus of Electronic Music compilation. But I like this Alva Noto album quite a bit. I started jotting little notes as I listened to it and now that I try to say anything about the album I realize that my stupid notes will make more sense just by themselves. So here they are:
Quote:
Overall, good album.
__________________
Like an arrow,
I was only passing through. |
|
02-08-2011, 06:17 AM | #33 (permalink) | |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Quote:
|
|
02-08-2011, 11:13 PM | #34 (permalink) |
air quote
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pollen & mold
Posts: 3,108
|
I've listened to OHM. There are a lot of songs .. er, compositions that I really like and have listened to many times. It's just really long and I can't sit through the whole thing.
__________________
Like an arrow,
I was only passing through. |
|