![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
:laughing:
It's a great record. Not to review it advance. Learn to love it! |
Quote:
|
I'd always assumed the point of such a group was to force you out of your comfort zone. That's generally what the purpose of avant-garde music is (as a blanket statement, of course). In order to truly introduce and reinforce new forms of the avant-garde, they need to be given a fair shot. Perhaps if you download this, you'll learn to appreciate noisier, more improvisational and more angular works. Perhaps not. But you'll gain the experience, the ability to discuss it intelligently, and you'll know you've given the genre the old college try.
Had I known I might not like Flux, I probably still would've downloaded it, as I want to contribute something to this group (it's tight-nit enough as it is!) and maybe I'd find something to enjoy. |
Quote:
EDIT: By the way, this isn't the 1989 re-release is it? It has the same album cover but it's not labeled as such. |
So I already asked this in another thread, but would you like me to add polls to discussion threads so that you can rate these albums? Personally, I don't really like to rate numerically or whatever, but maybe it would be helpful for some like OccultHawk pointed out. However, for those curious about these albums I feel it would be more helpful to read our comments than to just check our ratings.
But, anyway, what do you say? Rating polls or no rating polls? |
I'd like it, as long as it involved words rather than numbers. I'd much rather say the album is excellent than '4.0/5.0!!!'. Numbers have a tendency to obscure meanings due to their subjective value, whereas the definitions of words are set and can't be tampered with much beyond a slight tweak.
|
Yeah that's what I had in mind actually, words not the actual numbers. OK I'll think of the format and a number of options.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.