Originally Posted by Exo

I might be speaking for myself here because I can't ascertain the amount of time other mods spend on the boards but a lot of the times this comes off the way you're seeing it because a moderator didn't see the exchanges until the damage has already been done. OH described himself perfectly as somebody who sits back and shoots a spitball and lets the rest unfold. Merit and Chula are dudes who will write novels about how they are right and NEVER let it go and unfortunately they're still actively trying to "win" the topic at hand when we step in. As I kind of told you before, if they just said "whatever" it wouldn't be an issue.

We're not biased. We're busy. We clean up. It's like Bats and OH start the food fight but Merit and Chula are the ones still throwing sh*t when the teachers show up. Who do you think is going to get reprimanded first? I always read from the beginning and talk to everybody involved. Ask Bats how many PM's I send him.

Stop thinking we live on this forum and see everything as it happens.

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre

I have seen active mods on here while this goes down. Some unnamed ones that are even smack dab in the middle of it. That excuse doesn't fly.

Originally Posted by Exo

Weird, it was like I was speaking for myself or something.

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre

Then why are you using it as an excuse for the whole moderation team by saying "stop assuming we all live on the forum" when I never did.

Originally Posted by Exo

The points you're trying to make directly tie into the assumption that you think we live on the forum and can police everything as it happens with utmost discretion. It isn't real. There are six of us. We try our best. Even Frownland.

Maybe I should just start a log about every mod action that gets performed so you'd realize we actually do discipline these members you think get passes. OH just got banned not too long ago.

Originally Posted by Exo

The points you're trying to make directly tie into the assumption that you think we live on the forum and can police everything as it happens with utmost discretion. It isn't real. There are six of us. We try our best. Even Frownland.

Maybe I should just start a log about every mod action that gets performed so you'd realize we actually do discipline these members you think get passes. OH just got banned not too long ago.

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre

I don't think it's even possible to have a moderation team that doesn't have some sort of bias and that we should just deal with it.

Originally Posted by rostasi

Good, I'm glad this thread is finished.

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre

The point I made is that there was a clear bias against merit because every time it appeared there WERE mods here to moderate. They didn't until MERIT started getting out of hand while letting personal attacks that crossed what ever line was drawn against him go by. I know this because I have made personal attacks towards Merit that crossed the line and never got a warning for it.

I didn't say I have a problem with it or that it needs to be changed, but the only complaints anybody has on here is with that clear undeniable bias. Not with the forum needing stricter moderation.

I'm just pointing that out to say it DOES exist. Like I already said though, I don't think it's even possible to have a moderation team that doesn't have some sort of bias and that we should just deal with it.

Originally Posted by Exo

You need to work on conveying intent then because It really seemed like you were saying we're not doing our jobs right.

Originally Posted by Exo

"I know this because I have made personal attacks towards Merit that crossed the line and never got a warning for it."

INFRACTION!