My objective is not to bother you so not sure why you would say that, like I'm bullying you or something. I'm not expecting a reversal of anything of that nature. Hell, I'm not even expecting a single shred of agreement for what anything of what I'm saying across the board. I'm just calling it like I see it.

Also @WWWP message them to me.

K thanks for letting me know, o knowledgeable one.

Well, you joined only four or five months ago, so...

You're not seeing the whole picture is the point.

And no, what do you think I memorized them?

It was a request. I'm not owed anything.

Are y'all gonna treat me like a proxy Merit cause I dared to disagree with you even slightly?

I can't see the whole picture cause I literally can't see the whole picture. That's why I'm asking for it lol.

I could have sworn mods could see post history but in retrospect maybe that was an urban legend.

Yeah I'm sorry windsock but you didnt see it. If you had, your tone would be much different I promise you. He has a history here, that was just the final straw.

Yes. Because you're Jewish.

Seriously though, yeah if you're going to talk out of your ass you're going to hear feedback

Yes likely my "traditionalism" bit would likely be different if it really is as severe as you say, but even then that's based on what I can see currently. My point about mod bias would still stand regardless.

Please point me to a single worthwhile thing you've ever posted.

The whole picture as in the WHOLE picture. The greater context. Not just the deleted posts. That's why "calling it like you see it" means literally nothing because you are operating under bad information.

It was severe enough to warrant a ban of a longtime mb member with history here who has often times just sort of got away with it until now.

I did attempt to PM him a while ago a few times to sort of tell him to just chill out and not get into debates. Worked for about a day. Then I gave up.

I'm calling it like I see it in regards to how mods crack down on rulebreakers. No matter what he could have said things that people like OH have said in the past still fall under the umbrella of "personal attacks" and other inflammatory remarks. Would that not also result in his ban under the same guise? Last time I checked, there was no barometer in the rulebook.

I'll continue to say I don't know the whole story and will continue wanting to now about it. I don't really care if you view what I have to say as worthless, but keep in mind I'm specifically discussing information only I have seen cause the rest of it was purged by you.