![]() |
So, about that 15 posts rule...
Can we please get rid of it? All it's doing is making people spam the shit out of the forum to get to post a link. Who cares if they post a link. Delete it and ban them if it bothers you...:/
|
Agree tbh.
|
It's been a problem for years. I second this.
|
Who cares if they spam the forum when their posts end up deleted? Just ignore it if it bothers you.
|
Quote:
|
Maybe make it so that before you are able to post elsewhere on the forum, new members are required to create an introduction thread and make at least 5-15 posts in it? Or make an intro thread that has to be approved by a mod before they can post elsewhere on the forum?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And it's really not much work at all tbh. Quit trolling with your condescending posts. |
It's also funny how people keep expecting the general mechanics of the site to change. The owners don't give a ****.
|
Quote:
One can dream. https://www.gay.hr/up/smilies/sigh.gif |
Frown vs Adidas > Frown vs Chules
|
If I got demoded I would probably get remoded or maybe even remodeled.
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure it's not something we have control over.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Unless mod-troll and grindy disagree though. ;) |
I could take it or leave it tbh but I do think it's a successful deterrent in most cases. At the end of the day, this is a dying medium and the owners treat it as such. If we were going to bother them about something, I'd choose changing the colour scheme, the top graphic, allowing people with a high number of posts to make journal entries without needing approval, or adding upvote capabilities instead. Spam that's going to be deleted by people thinking we haven't seen someone surpass the filter before just doesn't seem to be that pressing of an issue except in the cases where there's a few hours in between a mod being logged on. Plus in a way it makes it easier to spot spam when people do try to do the quick 15 since it's usually pretty obvious.
|
Hey, good ideas. Can you contact the owners and ask about those things, Frown?
|
I'll give Sundar a call and ask him to make the banner a 3 hour long gif of my facial expression slowly changing from happy to sad to my o face.
|
I just want to say, "Good luck. We're all counting on you."
|
It's just a pretty small grievance/nonissue imo.
|
I'm more concerned with WWWP's illegal name length.
|
Yeah, the name length is annoying.
|
Quote:
|
Mine is a simple statement of fact. Yours is penis envy.
|
I like the rule the way it is personally.
|
Quote:
For me unlikely but ok. It's not really an issue that requires careful consideration and an in depth debate, it was just an idea, one that I think/thought might have made the mods' job slightly easier, and gotten rid of a slight annoyance of having to see random threads being revived with stupid posts just so these unfortunate souls can complete their mission. ;) But wha'eva. :) |
As Frown said, it makes spotting spammers even easier.
|
Quote:
|
I like the idea of letting the fool think he’s being clever,
then cutting his head right off his body. |
Not gonna lie, it's very satisfying to ban someone right after their fifteenth post.
|
It should be 100 posts! I imagine the poor fools posting like crazy just to be able to post a link! The hilarity of their futility! Like life itself! https://www.gay.hr/up/smilies/dreamy.gif
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Since the owners don't give a sh*t about this place, we could always get a hacker to change any aesthetics that bother us. |
I think you're all ignoring 66Sexy vs Fluff. We got stuff going on.
|
Fluff v Rez>>>>>>>>>>
|
Rez <3<3<3<3<3<3
|
Why is it that whenever Frownland...
A: Disagrees with something + B: Is a bit sassy = Troll? Do you people know what a troll is? Frown is just a sassy bitch. |
It's not Fluff vs anyone.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.