|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Which statements do you agree the most with? (public poll) | |||
1A. The rules should be applied equally to all members (ex. rules apply equally to mods and users) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 60.00% |
1B. The rules should NOT be applied equally to all members (ex. mods more lenient with regualrs) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 32.00% |
2A. Rules should apply equally to all forums |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
2B. Rules should NOT apply equally to all forums (ex. "Safe Zones" less strict) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 72.00% |
3A. Outside safe zones, mod policy should allow for short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 40.00% |
3B. Outside safe zones, mod policy should discourage short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 52.00% |
3C. Outside safe zones, mod policy should prohibit short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 8.00% |
4A. General mod policy should be to react to every instance where a rule is broken |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 40.00% |
4B. General mod policy should allow for mods NOT to react to an instance where a rule is broken |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 60.00% |
5A. Details of rule enforcement is ultimately between a mod and a user |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
5B. Details of rule enforcement can ulimately be subject to other mods scrutiny |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 16.00% |
5C. Details of rule enforcement can be subject to public scrutiny |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 64.00% |
6A. For punishment, there should be a general policy to use temporary infractions |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
6B. For punishment, there should be a general policy to use warnings, infractions / bans |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 64.00% |
6C. There should be no general policy for how punishment is carried out |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
7A. For rule enforcement, moderators should use a joint, anonymous account |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 16.00% |
7B. For rule enforcement, moderators should use their personal accounts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 84.00% |
8A. A new moderation policy should have a trial run first (ex. 1 - 2 months) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 72.00% |
8B. A new moderation policy should NOT have a trial run first (implemented immediately) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
9A. The mod team should be bolstered with additional mods. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 52.00% |
9B. The mod team should NOT be bolstered with additional mods. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 24.00% |
9C. The current mod team should be retained. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 68.00% |
9D. Some or all of the current moderators should be replaced. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 24.00% |
10. Some of my concerns are not listed in the individual items, but I will voice them in a reply. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#26 (permalink) | |
Facilitator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
|
![]()
I feel the poll was a very good idea, and I'm glad we had it, thanks to Tore.
People derailing conversations with moderator-sanctioned hostility is a main reason I feel the site will benefit from some changes in moderation policy. Some of these changes were voted for by the majority in this poll. One important thing we learned from the poll is that the majority of poll voters feel that "the rules should be applied equally to all members (ex. rules apply equally to mods and users)" and mods should not be more lenient with regulars. Also, the majority of voters selected that "details of rule enforcement can be subject to public scrutiny." This change could help MB members feel assured that moderators have applied the rules fairly and not made moderation decisions that were biased in favor of very active or long-term members or moderators.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|