|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Which statements do you agree the most with? (public poll) | |||
1A. The rules should be applied equally to all members (ex. rules apply equally to mods and users) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 60.00% |
1B. The rules should NOT be applied equally to all members (ex. mods more lenient with regualrs) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 32.00% |
2A. Rules should apply equally to all forums |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
2B. Rules should NOT apply equally to all forums (ex. "Safe Zones" less strict) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 72.00% |
3A. Outside safe zones, mod policy should allow for short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 40.00% |
3B. Outside safe zones, mod policy should discourage short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 52.00% |
3C. Outside safe zones, mod policy should prohibit short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 8.00% |
4A. General mod policy should be to react to every instance where a rule is broken |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 40.00% |
4B. General mod policy should allow for mods NOT to react to an instance where a rule is broken |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 60.00% |
5A. Details of rule enforcement is ultimately between a mod and a user |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
5B. Details of rule enforcement can ulimately be subject to other mods scrutiny |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 16.00% |
5C. Details of rule enforcement can be subject to public scrutiny |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 64.00% |
6A. For punishment, there should be a general policy to use temporary infractions |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
6B. For punishment, there should be a general policy to use warnings, infractions / bans |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 64.00% |
6C. There should be no general policy for how punishment is carried out |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
7A. For rule enforcement, moderators should use a joint, anonymous account |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 16.00% |
7B. For rule enforcement, moderators should use their personal accounts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 84.00% |
8A. A new moderation policy should have a trial run first (ex. 1 - 2 months) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 72.00% |
8B. A new moderation policy should NOT have a trial run first (implemented immediately) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
9A. The mod team should be bolstered with additional mods. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 52.00% |
9B. The mod team should NOT be bolstered with additional mods. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 24.00% |
9C. The current mod team should be retained. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 68.00% |
9D. Some or all of the current moderators should be replaced. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 24.00% |
10. Some of my concerns are not listed in the individual items, but I will voice them in a reply. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
![]() Quote:
If you are blind and allowed to drive a car, then you're treated differently. Likewise, all these circumstantial rules that affect newbies would also affect us if we were newbs (thus applying equally to all in that circumstance) and newb is an unspecific term that doesn't differentiate on things like the colour your skin or gender - rather like the no-driving-rule for blind people. It's hard to get all this into one 100 characters option, though. I think only two of us have explained our votes so far. It's up to you, but if you do, I'll read it.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|