|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Which statements do you agree the most with? (public poll) | |||
1A. The rules should be applied equally to all members (ex. rules apply equally to mods and users) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 60.00% |
1B. The rules should NOT be applied equally to all members (ex. mods more lenient with regualrs) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 32.00% |
2A. Rules should apply equally to all forums |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
2B. Rules should NOT apply equally to all forums (ex. "Safe Zones" less strict) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 72.00% |
3A. Outside safe zones, mod policy should allow for short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 40.00% |
3B. Outside safe zones, mod policy should discourage short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 52.00% |
3C. Outside safe zones, mod policy should prohibit short, nonsense posts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 8.00% |
4A. General mod policy should be to react to every instance where a rule is broken |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 40.00% |
4B. General mod policy should allow for mods NOT to react to an instance where a rule is broken |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 60.00% |
5A. Details of rule enforcement is ultimately between a mod and a user |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
5B. Details of rule enforcement can ulimately be subject to other mods scrutiny |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 16.00% |
5C. Details of rule enforcement can be subject to public scrutiny |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 64.00% |
6A. For punishment, there should be a general policy to use temporary infractions |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
6B. For punishment, there should be a general policy to use warnings, infractions / bans |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 64.00% |
6C. There should be no general policy for how punishment is carried out |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
7A. For rule enforcement, moderators should use a joint, anonymous account |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 16.00% |
7B. For rule enforcement, moderators should use their personal accounts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 84.00% |
8A. A new moderation policy should have a trial run first (ex. 1 - 2 months) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 72.00% |
8B. A new moderation policy should NOT have a trial run first (implemented immediately) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
9A. The mod team should be bolstered with additional mods. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 52.00% |
9B. The mod team should NOT be bolstered with additional mods. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 24.00% |
9C. The current mod team should be retained. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 68.00% |
9D. Some or all of the current moderators should be replaced. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 24.00% |
10. Some of my concerns are not listed in the individual items, but I will voice them in a reply. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 20.00% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) | ||
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,996
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
All joking aside, this is something of a serious point I have to make, which will probably annoy tore. It's not meant to: I did like tore (note the tense here) but the way he's conducted himself throughout this whole enterprise, essentially trying to push something on the community that a majority said they did not want (see Exo's incisive analogy) has forced me to rethink how I feel about him. Sad I know, but there it is. Anyway, the thing is, I feel I would have given this whole proposal more attention, importance and significance if it had come from someone who's here all the time, be they mod or not. Someone I was used to talking to, or seeing talking, making threads, making jokes, doing reviews, joining in conversations. But for a long time now tore has been, to quote his usertitle (or his one up to a very short time ago) an "absent friend". He hasn't been involved with the community and I can't help but remember the last significant contribution he made, that I can recall, was when a little while back he invited anyone who wanted to to leave MB and join him in setting up a new forum. That didn't happen, and then a while later we get this. So to my mind (whether right or wrong) it's like tore didn't get his new forum, so now he's trying to mould, bend and force this one into a shape he is comfortable with, while sadly tending to ignore the fact that so many people don't want that. This is the main reason why I don't agree with his proposal. It's like someone has been away for years and then comes home and says "I know how this place can be better." The initial reaction would be "Who the hell are you? You haven't been here for years." I know tore was/is a respected member and ex-mod, but to me this is just a little suspect, and it may be coincidence but I'm willing to bet it's not. And I personally don't want (and again, I hope no offence is taken) someone who has not been here for years to come back and tell me how the place should be run, change it all up and then, by his own admission, perhaps leave and not even be part of it once it's been changed. I'm happy with MB as it is, which is why I will continue to oppose any attempts to significantly change it. I would also like to know: is tore's proposal still alive because he said this poll was "something different". So what is it? I think I certainly at least, am still labouring to connect the two, and definitely feel the one is the product of the other. To put it in terms you Americans will be familiar with, it feels like it's a sneaky rider being attached to a bill?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
||
![]() |
|